Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] general protection fault in bpf_prog_offload_verifier_prep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2023-09-06 at 07:57 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 16:50:23 +0300 Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/offload.c b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
> > index 3e4f2ec1af06..302e38bffffa 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/offload.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
> > @@ -199,12 +199,11 @@ static int __bpf_prog_dev_bound_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct net_device *n
> >         offload->netdev = netdev;
> >  
> >         ondev = bpf_offload_find_netdev(offload->netdev);
> > +       if (bpf_prog_is_offloaded(prog->aux) && (!ondev || !ondev->offdev)) {
> > +               err = -EINVAL;
> > +               goto err_free;
> > +       }
> >         if (!ondev) {
> > -               if (bpf_prog_is_offloaded(prog->aux)) {
> > -                       err = -EINVAL;
> > -                       goto err_free;
> > -               }
> > -
> >                 /* When only binding to the device, explicitly
> >                  * create an entry in the hashtable.
> >                  */
> 
> LGTM, FWIW.

Thanks, I'll wrap it up as a proper patch with a test.

> 
> > With the following reasoning: for offloaded programs offload device
> > should exist and it should not be a fake device create in !ondev branch.
> > 
> > Stanislav, could you please take a look? I think this is related to commit:
> > 2b3486bc2d23 ("bpf: Introduce device-bound XDP programs")






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux