On Tue, Sep 05 2023, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 09:06:19PM +0000, Puranjay Mohan wrote: >> +cont: >> + >> + /* Call appropriate function */ >> + if (sign) >> + emit_mov_i(ARM_IP, op == BPF_DIV ? (u32)jit_sdiv64 : (u32)jit_smod64, ctx); >> + else >> + emit_mov_i(ARM_IP, op == BPF_DIV ? (u32)jit_udiv64 : (u32)jit_mod64, ctx); > > Same comment as the previous patch here. Will fix both in next version. > >> + >> + emit_blx_r(ARM_IP, ctx); >> + >> + /* Save return value */ >> + if (rd[1] != ARM_R0) { >> + emit(ARM_MOV_R(rd[0], ARM_R1), ctx); >> + emit(ARM_MOV_R(rd[1], ARM_R0), ctx); >> + } >> + >> + /* Recover {R1, R0} from stack if it is not Rd */ >> + if (rd[1] != ARM_R0) >> + emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R0) | BIT(ARM_R1)), ctx); >> + else >> + emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx); >> + >> + /* Recover {R3, R2} from stack if it is not Rd */ >> + if (rd[1] != ARM_R2) >> + emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R2) | BIT(ARM_R3)), ctx); >> + else >> + emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx); > > if (rd[1] != ARM_R0) { > emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R0) | BIT(ARM_R1)), ctx); > emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx); > } else if (rd[1] != ARM_R2) { > emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx); > emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R2) | BIT(ARM_R3)), ctx); > } else { > emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 16), ctx); > } > > Hmm? Actually, there can also be a situation where rd[1] != ARM_R0 && rd[1] != ARM_R2, so should I do it like: if (rd[1] != ARM_R0 && rd[1] != ARM_R2) { emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R0) | BIT(ARM_R1)), ctx); emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R2) | BIT(ARM_R3)), ctx); } else if (rd[1] != ARM_R0) { emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R0) | BIT(ARM_R1)), ctx); emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx); } else if (rd[1] != ARM_R2) { emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx); emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R2) | BIT(ARM_R3)), ctx); } else { emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 16), ctx); } Thanks, Puranjay