Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] fprobe: rethook: Use ftrace_regs in fprobe exit handler and rethook

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I found that this is not enough becuase s390/loongarch already implemented
> their rethook, and as far as I can see, the s390 ftrace_regs does not save
> the required registers for rethook. Thus, for such architecture, we need
> another kconfig flag and keep using the pt_regs for rethook.

Looking into arch_rethook_trampoline() i think we save all required
registers - which register do you think are missing? Or is there another
function i should look at?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux