[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.] On 26.07.23 07:06, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 03:34:26PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 25.07.23 15:24, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 23.07.23 02:06, Nathan Chancellor wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 07:21:05AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it: >>>>>> >>>>>> I rebuild today latest version from mainline repo. >>>>>> And i notice issue regarding xen-netfront.c. > [...] >> Oh, in fact there is a way in Xen to do that correctly. It schould be enough to >> use ring[XEN_FLEX_ARRAY_DIM], which will do the right thing. >> >> So I'll write a Xen patch first, after all. > > Perfect! I went to go look, and yes, this is good: #regzbot resolve: will be dealt with on the xen side #regzbot ignore-activity Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
