The Documentation/bpf/standardization subdirectory contains documents
that will be standardized with the IETF. There are a few things we can
do to clean it up:
- Move linux-notes.rst back to Documentation/bpf. It doesn't belong in
the standardization directory.
- Move ABI-specific verbiage from instruction-set.rst into a new abi.rst
document. This document will be expanded significantly over time. For
now, we just need to get anything describing ABI out of
instruction-set.rst.
- Say BPF instead of eBPF in our documents. It's just creating
confusion.
There is more we can and should do. For example, we should create a
maps.rst document that will be a proposed standard for cross platform
map types, and remove any relevant content from instruction-set.rst.
This can be done in a subsequent patch set.
David Vernet (3):
bpf,docs: Move linux-notes.rst to root bpf docs tree
bpf,docs: Add abi.rst document to standardization subdirectory
bpf,docs: s/eBPF/BPF in standards documents
Documentation/bpf/index.rst | 1 +
.../bpf/{standardization => }/linux-notes.rst | 0
Documentation/bpf/standardization/abi.rst | 25 ++++++++++++
Documentation/bpf/standardization/index.rst | 2 +-
.../bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 38 ++++++-------------
5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
rename Documentation/bpf/{standardization => }/linux-notes.rst (100%)
create mode 100644 Documentation/bpf/standardization/abi.rst
--
2.41.0
