On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 08:57:21AM +0800, Rong Tao wrote: > Hi, jirka. Thanks for your reply. > > > > @@ -164,13 +165,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > > > } > > > > > > /* initialize kernel symbol translation */ > > > - if (load_kallsyms()) { > > > + ksyms = load_kallsyms(); > > > > if we keep the load_kallsyms/ksym_search/ksym_get_addr functions as described > > in [1] the samples/bpf would stay untouched apart from the Makefile change > > Maybe we should make this modification, wouldn't it be better? After all, > not modifying the source code of samples/bpf is not really a reason not to > make modifications to load_kallsyms(), what do you think? I think we want separate selftest and samples changes and I don't see other way to do that > > In addition, if we continue to keep the original ksym_search() interface, > the following problems are very difficult to deal with: > > Source code ksym_search [1] > > struct ksym *ksym_search(long key) > { > int start = 0, end = sym_cnt; > int result; > > /* kallsyms not loaded. return NULL */ > if (sym_cnt <= 0) > return NULL; > > while (start < end) { > size_t mid = start + (end - start) / 2; > > result = key - syms[mid].addr; > if (result < 0) > end = mid; > else if (result > 0) > start = mid + 1; > else > return &syms[mid]; <<< > } > > if (start >= 1 && syms[start - 1].addr < key && > key < syms[start].addr) > /* valid ksym */ > return &syms[start - 1]; <<< > > /* out of range. return _stext */ > return &syms[0]; <<< > } > > The original ksym_search() interface directly returns the global syms > address, which is also dangerous for multi-threading. If we allocate new > memory for this, it is not a perfect solution. the assumption was that the original ksym_search touches the global syms allocated before running tests.. then tests that actually need fresh kallsyms data (because of bpf_testmod load/unload) would get their own copy of kallsyms jirka > > If we rewrite > > struct ksym *ksym_search(long key) > > to > struct ksym ksym_search(long key) > > This also affects the source code in samples/bpf. > > The same problem exists with ksym_get_addr(). > > Best wishes, > Rong Tao > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c#n100 > >