On 8/25/23 9:19 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Unless I am notally confused it is wrong. We are going to return or
skip next_task so we need to check next_task-files, not task->files.
Thanks for capturing this. This is indeed an oversight.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
index 1589ec3faded..2264870ae3fc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static struct task_struct *task_group_seq_get_next(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_comm
common->pid_visiting = *tid;
- if (skip_if_dup_files && task->files == task->group_leader->files) {
+ if (skip_if_dup_files && next_task->files == next_task->group_leader->files) {
task = next_task;
goto retry;
}