Currently, in function bpf_obj_free_fields(), for local kptr,
a warning will be issued if the struct does not contain any
special fields. But actually the kernel seems totally okay
with a local kptr without any special fields. Permitting
no special fields also aligns with future percpu kptr which
also allows no special fields.
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
NOTE: I didn't put a fix tag since except the warning
there is no correctness issue here.
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 10666d17b9e3..ebeb0695305a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -657,7 +657,6 @@ void bpf_obj_free_fields(const struct btf_record *rec, void *obj)
if (!btf_is_kernel(field->kptr.btf)) {
pointee_struct_meta = btf_find_struct_meta(field->kptr.btf,
field->kptr.btf_id);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!pointee_struct_meta);
migrate_disable();
__bpf_obj_drop_impl(xchgd_field, pointee_struct_meta ?
pointee_struct_meta->record :
--
2.34.1
