Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: Support triple-underscore flavors for kfunc relocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 15:53:52 -0700 you wrote:
> The function signature of kfuncs can change at any time due to their
> intentional lack of stability guarantees. As kfuncs become more widely
> used, BPF program writers will need facilities to support calling
> different versions of a kfunc from a single BPF object. Consider this
> simplified example based on a real scenario we ran into at Meta:
> 
>   /* initial kfunc signature */
>   int some_kfunc(void *ptr)
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3,bpf-next,1/2] libbpf: Support triple-underscore flavors for kfunc relocation
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5964a223f5e4
  - [v3,bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add CO-RE relocs kfunc flavors tests
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/63ae8eb2c5b1

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux