Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 03/13] integrity/digest_cache: Add functions to populate and search

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat Aug 12, 2023 at 1:46 PM EEST, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add digest_cache_init_htable(), to size a hash table depending on the
> number of digests to be added to the cache.
>
> Add digest_cache_add() and digest_cache_lookup() to respectively add and
> lookup a digest in the digest cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  security/integrity/digest_cache.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  security/integrity/digest_cache.h |  24 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 155 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/digest_cache.c b/security/integrity/digest_cache.c
> index 4201c68171a..d14d84b804b 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/digest_cache.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/digest_cache.c
> @@ -315,3 +315,134 @@ struct digest_cache *digest_cache_get(struct dentry *dentry,
>  
>  	return iint->dig_user;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * digest_cache_init_htable - Allocate and initialize the hash table
> + * @digest_cache: Digest cache
> + * @num_digests: Number of digests to add to the digest cache
> + *
> + * This function allocates and initializes the hash table. Its size is
> + * determined by the number of digests to add to the digest cache, known
> + * at this point by the parser calling this function.
> + *
> + * Return: Zero on success, a negative value otherwise.
> + */
> +int digest_cache_init_htable(struct digest_cache *digest_cache,
> +			     u64 num_digests)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!digest_cache)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	digest_cache->num_slots = num_digests / DIGEST_CACHE_HTABLE_DEPTH;
> +	if (!digest_cache->num_slots)
> +		digest_cache->num_slots = 1;
> +
> +	digest_cache->slots = kmalloc_array(num_digests,
> +					    sizeof(*digest_cache->slots),
> +					    GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!digest_cache->slots)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < digest_cache->num_slots; i++)
> +		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&digest_cache->slots[i]);
> +
> +	pr_debug("Initialized %d hash table slots for digest list %s\n",
> +		 digest_cache->num_slots, digest_cache->path_str);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * digest_cache_add - Add a new digest to the digest cache
> + * @digest_cache: Digest cache
> + * @digest: Digest to add
> + *
> + * This function, invoked by a digest list parser, adds a digest extracted
> + * from a digest list to the digest cache.
> + *
> + * Return: Zero on success, a negative value on error.

Nit: previous had a different phrasing "a negative value otherwise".

I would suggest "a POSIX error code otherwise" for both.

> + */
> +int digest_cache_add(struct digest_cache *digest_cache, u8 *digest)
> +{
> +	struct digest_cache_entry *entry;
> +	unsigned int key;
> +	int digest_len;
> +
> +	if (!digest_cache)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	digest_len = hash_digest_size[digest_cache->algo];
> +
> +	entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry) + digest_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!entry)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	memcpy(entry->digest, digest, digest_len);
> +
> +	key = digest_cache_hash_key(digest, digest_cache->num_slots);
> +	hlist_add_head(&entry->hnext, &digest_cache->slots[key]);
> +	pr_debug("Add digest %s:%*phN from digest list %s\n",
> +		 hash_algo_name[digest_cache->algo], digest_len, digest,
> +		 digest_cache->path_str);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * digest_cache_lookup - Searches a digest in the digest cache
> + * @digest_cache: Digest cache
> + * @digest: Digest to search
> + * @algo: Algorithm of the digest to search
> + * @pathname: Path of the file whose digest is looked up
> + *
> + * This function, invoked by IMA or EVM, searches the calculated digest of
> + * a file or file metadata in the digest cache acquired with
> + * digest_cache_get().
> + *
> + * Return: Zero if the digest is found, a negative value if not.
> + */
> +int digest_cache_lookup(struct digest_cache *digest_cache, u8 *digest,
> +			enum hash_algo algo, const char *pathname)
> +{
> +	struct digest_cache_entry *entry;
> +	unsigned int key;
> +	int digest_len;
> +	int search_depth = 0;
> +
> +	if (!digest_cache)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	if (digest_cache->algo == HASH_ALGO__LAST) {
> +		pr_debug("Algorithm not set for digest list %s\n",
> +			 digest_cache->path_str);
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +	}
> +
> +	digest_len = hash_digest_size[digest_cache->algo];
> +
> +	if (algo != digest_cache->algo) {
> +		pr_debug("Algo mismatch for file %s, digest %s:%*phN in digest list %s (%s)\n",
> +			 pathname, hash_algo_name[algo], digest_len, digest,
> +			 digest_cache->path_str,
> +			 hash_algo_name[digest_cache->algo]);
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +	}
> +
> +	key = digest_cache_hash_key(digest, digest_cache->num_slots);
> +
> +	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &digest_cache->slots[key], hnext) {
> +		if (!memcmp(entry->digest, digest, digest_len)) {
> +			pr_debug("Cache hit at depth %d for file %s, digest %s:%*phN in digest list %s\n",
> +				 search_depth, pathname, hash_algo_name[algo],
> +				 digest_len, digest, digest_cache->path_str);
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +
> +		search_depth++;
> +	}
> +
> +	pr_debug("Cache miss for file %s, digest %s:%*phN in digest list %s\n",
> +		 pathname, hash_algo_name[algo], digest_len, digest,
> +		 digest_cache->path_str);
> +	return -ENOENT;
> +}
> diff --git a/security/integrity/digest_cache.h b/security/integrity/digest_cache.h
> index ff88e8593c6..01cd70f9850 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/digest_cache.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/digest_cache.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,11 @@ static inline unsigned int digest_cache_hash_key(u8 *digest,
>  void digest_cache_free(struct digest_cache *digest_cache);
>  struct digest_cache *digest_cache_get(struct dentry *dentry,
>  				      struct integrity_iint_cache *iint);
> +int digest_cache_init_htable(struct digest_cache *digest_cache,
> +			     u64 num_digests);
> +int digest_cache_add(struct digest_cache *digest_cache, u8 *digest);
> +int digest_cache_lookup(struct digest_cache *digest_cache, u8 *digest,
> +			enum hash_algo algo, const char *pathname);
>  #else
>  static inline void digest_cache_free(struct digest_cache *digest_cache)
>  {
> @@ -77,5 +82,24 @@ digest_cache_get(struct dentry *dentry, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int digest_cache_init_htable(struct digest_cache *digest_cache,
> +					   u64 num_digests)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int digest_cache_add(struct digest_cache *digest_cache,
> +				   u8 *digest)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int digest_cache_lookup(struct digest_cache *digest_cache,
> +				      u8 *digest, enum hash_algo algo,
> +				      const char *pathname)
> +{
> +	return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_INTEGRITY_DIGEST_CACHE */
>  #endif /* _DIGEST_CACHE_H */
> -- 
> 2.34.1

Why all this complexity instead of using xarray?

https://docs.kernel.org/core-api/xarray.html

BR, Jarkko





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux