On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 01:27:32AM -0400, Will Hawkins wrote: Hi Will, This looks great, thanks! Acked-by: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Add additional precision on the semantics of the sign extension > operations in eBPF. In addition, fix a very minor typo. Just for future reference so we can have consistent nomenclature: s/eBPF/BPF
