On 03/08/2023 16.04, huangjie.albert wrote:
AF_XDP is a kernel bypass technology that can greatly improve performance. However, for virtual devices like veth, even with the use of AF_XDP sockets, there are still many additional software paths that consume CPU resources. This patch series focuses on optimizing the performance of AF_XDP sockets for veth virtual devices. Patches 1 to 4 mainly involve preparatory work. Patch 5 introduces tx queue and tx napi for packet transmission, while patch 9 primarily implements zero-copy, and patch 10 adds support for batch sending of IPv4 UDP packets. These optimizations significantly reduce the software path and support checksum offload. I tested those feature with A typical topology is shown below: veth<-->veth-peer veth1-peer<--->veth1 1 | | 7 |2 6| | | bridge<------->eth0(mlnx5)- switch -eth1(mlnx5)<--->bridge1 3 4 5 (machine1) (machine2) AF_XDP socket is attach to veth and veth1. and send packets to physical NIC(eth0) veth:(172.17.0.2/24) bridge:(172.17.0.1/24) eth0:(192.168.156.66/24) eth1(172.17.0.2/24) bridge1:(172.17.0.1/24) eth0:(192.168.156.88/24) after set default route、snat、dnat. we can have a tests to get the performance results. packets send from veth to veth1: af_xdp test tool: link:https://github.com/cclinuxer/libxudp send:(veth) ./objs/xudpperf send --dst 192.168.156.88:6002 -l 1300 recv:(veth1) ./objs/xudpperf recv --src 172.17.0.2:6002 udp test tool:iperf3 send:(veth) iperf3 -c 192.168.156.88 -p 6002 -l 1300 -b 60G -u recv:(veth1) iperf3 -s -p 6002 performance: performance:(test weth libxdp lib) UDP : 250 Kpps (with 100% cpu) AF_XDP no zerocopy + no batch : 480 Kpps (with ksoftirqd 100% cpu) AF_XDP with zerocopy + no batch : 540 Kpps (with ksoftirqd 100% cpu) AF_XDP with batch + zerocopy : 1.5 Mpps (with ksoftirqd 15% cpu) With af_xdp batch, the libxdp user-space program reaches a bottleneck.
Do you mean libxdp [1] or libxudp ? [1] https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-tools/tree/master/lib/libxdp
Therefore, the softirq did not reach the limit. This is just an RFC patch series, and some code details still need further consideration. Please review this proposal.
I find this performance work interesting as we have customer requests (via Maryam (cc)) to improve AF_XDP performance both native and on veth. Our benchmark is stored at: https://github.com/maryamtahhan/veth-benchmark Great to see other companies also interested in this area. --Jesper
thanks! huangjie.albert (10): veth: Implement ethtool's get_ringparam() callback xsk: add dma_check_skip for skipping dma check veth: add support for send queue xsk: add xsk_tx_completed_addr function veth: use send queue tx napi to xmit xsk tx desc veth: add ndo_xsk_wakeup callback for veth sk_buff: add destructor_arg_xsk_pool for zero copy xdp: add xdp_mem_type MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL_TX veth: support zero copy for af xdp veth: af_xdp tx batch support for ipv4 udp drivers/net/veth.c | 729 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/skbuff.h | 1 + include/net/xdp.h | 1 + include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h | 1 + include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h | 1 + net/xdp/xsk.c | 6 + net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 3 +- net/xdp/xsk_queue.h | 11 + 8 files changed, 751 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)