On 07/25, Breno Leitao wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:31:28AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > On 07/24, Breno Leitao wrote: > > > Add support for getsockopt command (SOCKET_URING_OP_GETSOCKOPT), where > > > level is SOL_SOCKET. This is leveraging the sockptr_t infrastructure, > > > where a sockptr_t is either userspace or kernel space, and handled as > > > such. > > > > > > Function io_uring_cmd_getsockopt() is inspired by __sys_getsockopt(). > > > > We probably need to also have bpf bits in the new > > io_uring_cmd_getsockopt? > > It might be interesting to have the BPF hook for this function as > well, but I would like to do it in a following patch, so, I can > experiment with it better, if that is OK. We are not using io_uring, so fine with me. However, having a way to bypass get/setsockopt bpf might be problematic for some other heavy io_uring users. Lemme CC a bunch of Meta folks explicitly. I'm not sure what that state of bpf support in io_uring.
