On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 08:14:52AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 2:47 AM Zaremba, Larysa > <larysa.zaremba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 05:51:17PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 08:37:26PM +0200, Larysa Zaremba wrote: > > > > > Implement .xmo_rx_csum callback to allow XDP code to determine, > > > > > whether HW has validated any checksums. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c > > > > > index 54685d0747aa..6647a7e55ac8 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c > > > > > @@ -660,8 +660,37 @@ static int ice_xdp_rx_vlan_tag(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u16 *vlan_tci, > > > > > return 0; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > +/** > > > > > + * ice_xdp_rx_csum_lvl - Get level, at which HW has checked the checksum > > > > > + * @ctx: XDP buff pointer > > > > > + * @csum_status: destination address > > > > > + * @csum_info: destination address > > > > > + * > > > > > + * Copy HW checksum level (if was checked) to the destination address. > > > > > + */ > > > > > +static int ice_xdp_rx_csum(const struct xdp_md *ctx, > > > > > + enum xdp_csum_status *csum_status, > > > > > + union xdp_csum_info *csum_info) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + const struct ice_xdp_buff *xdp_ext = (void *)ctx; > > > > > + const union ice_32b_rx_flex_desc *eop_desc; > > > > > + enum ice_rx_csum_status status; > > > > > + u16 ptype; > > > > > + > > > > > + eop_desc = xdp_ext->pkt_ctx.eop_desc; > > > > > + ptype = ice_get_ptype(eop_desc); > > > > > + > > > > > + status = ice_get_rx_csum_status(eop_desc, ptype); > > > > > + if (status & ICE_RX_CSUM_NONE) > > > > > + return -ENODATA; > > > > > + > > > > > + *csum_status = ice_rx_csum_lvl(status) + 1; I'll duplicate an improved version of this line from another thread in case it could help with the comprehension during review: *csum_status = XDP_CHECKSUM_VALID_LVL0 + ice_rx_csum_lvl(status); > > > > > + return 0; > > > > > +} > > > > > > > > and xdp_csum_info from previous patch left uninitialized? > > > > What was the point adding it then? > > > > > > I suppose this driver only returns CHECKSUM_NONE or > > > CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY? Also based on a grep of the driver dir. > > > > > > > Yes, correct, current ice HW cannot produce complete checksum, > > so only CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for known protocols, CHECKSUM_NONE otherwise, > > nothing to initialize csum_info with in either case. > > > > xdp_csum_info is initialized in veth implementation though, but only > > csum_start/offset, so complete XDP checksum has no users in this patchset. > > Is this a problem? > > > > In previous version I had CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY-only kfunc, but I think everyone > > has agreed, csum hint kfunc should give more comprehensive output. > > csum kfunc supposed to be generic. > If for ICE it fills in one argument and for veth another then the whole > idea of generic api is not working. Both ice and veth fill in the csum_status, the need to fill in the csum_info is determined by the status. I don not see a problem with that. Maybe you have an issue with putting a valid checksum number into a status instead of info? Please clarify.