On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 5:53 AM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 18:17 -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> [...]
> > > > > +static void emit_movsx_reg(u8 **pprog, int num_bits, bool is64, u32 dst_reg,
> > > > > + u32 src_reg)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + u8 *prog = *pprog;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (is64) {
> > > > > + /* movs[b,w,l]q dst, src */
> > > > > + if (num_bits == 8)
> > > > > + EMIT4(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0f, 0xbe,
> > > > > + add_2reg(0xC0, src_reg, dst_reg));
> > > > > + else if (num_bits == 16)
> > > > > + EMIT4(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0f, 0xbf,
> > > > > + add_2reg(0xC0, src_reg, dst_reg));
> > > > > + else if (num_bits == 32)
> > > > > + EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x63,
> > > > > + add_2reg(0xC0, src_reg, dst_reg));
> > > > > + } else {
> > > > > + /* movs[b,w]l dst, src */
> > > > > + if (num_bits == 8) {
> > > > > + EMIT4(add_2mod(0x40, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0f, 0xbe,
> > > > > + add_2reg(0xC0, src_reg, dst_reg));
> > >
> > > Nit: As far as I understand 4-126 Vol. 2B of [1]
> > > the 0x40 prefix (REX prefix) is optional here
> > > (same as implemented below for num_bits == 16).
> >
> > I think 0x40 prefix at least neededif register is from R8 - R15?
>
> Yes, please see below.
>
> > I use this website to do asm/disasm experiments and did
> > try various combinations with first 8 and later 8 registers
> > and it seems correct results are generated.
>
> It seems all roads lead to that web-site, I used it as well :)
> Today I learned that the following could be used:
>
> echo 'movsx rax,ax' | as -o /dev/null -aln -msyntax=intel -mnaked-reg
>
> Which opens a road to scripting experiments.
This internal tool from llvm-project may also be useful:)
llvm-mc -triple=x86_64 -show-inst -x86-asm-syntax=intel
-output-asm-variant=1 <<< 'movsx rax, ax'
> > >
> > > [1] https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/671200
> > >
> > >
> > > > > + } else if (num_bits == 16) {
> > > > > + if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
> > > > > + EMIT1(add_2mod(0x40, src_reg, dst_reg));
> > > > > + EMIT3(add_2mod(0x0f, src_reg, dst_reg), 0xbf,
> > >
> > > Nit: Basing on the same manual I don't understand why
> > > add_2mod(0x0f, src_reg, dst_reg) is used, '0xf' should suffice
> > > (but I tried it both ways and it works...).
> >
> > From the above online assembler website.
> >
> > But I will check the doc to see whether it can be simplified.
>
> I tried all combinations of r0..r9 for 64/32-bit destinations,
> 32/16/8 sources [1]:
> - 0x40 based prefix is generated if any of the following is true:
> - dst is 64 bit
> - dst is ereg
> - src is ereg
> - dst is 32-bit and src is 'sil' (part of 'rsi', used for r2)
> (!) This one is surprising and web-site shows the same results.
> For example `movsx eax,sil` is encoded as `40 0F BE C6`,
> disassembling `0F BE C6` (w/o prefix) gives `movsx eax,dh`.
> - opcodes:
> - 63 64-bit dst, 32-bit src
> - 0F BF 64-bit dst, 16-bit src
> - 0F BE 64-bit dst, 8-bit src
> - 0F BF 32-bit dst, 16-bit src (same as 64-bit dst)
> - 0F BE 32-bit dst, 8-bit src (same as 64-bit dst)
>
> Script is at [2] (it is not particularly interesting, but in case if
> you want to tweak it).
>
> [1] https://gist.github.com/eddyz87/94b35fd89f023c43dd2480e196b28ea1
> [2] https://gist.github.com/eddyz87/60991379c547df11d30fa91901862227
>
> > > > > + add_2reg(0xC0, src_reg, dst_reg));
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + *pprog = prog;
> > > > > +}
> [...]
--
宋方睿
