Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/8] bpf: Add generic attach/detach/query API for multi-progs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/17/23 7:14 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
[...]
Andrii was asking whether we need to explicitly reject zero in [0] and
we've been chatting with Alexei about the same in [1]. So are we trying
to be more flexible here on purpose or should we outright return -EINVAL
for 0 id_or_fd? (or am I misreading this part?)

I was thinking if we can support it then why not, but fair enough, I changed
it in v6 into ...

  if (id)
    <resolve id>
  else if (id_or_fd)
    <resolve fd>

... format and rejecting 0 fd case with error. The !id_or_fd && !id case I
moved out of bpf_mprog_prog() and one layer up into bpf_mprog_tuple_relative()
with a comment to avoid confusion on why it is there. This is the case when we
have before/after with no object (and no id/link flag) for the prepend/append
case.

The rest looks great, thanks for the docs indeed!

Thanks!

0: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4Bza_X30yLPm0Lhy2c-u1Qw1Ci9AVoy5jo_XXCaT9zz+3jg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAKH8qBsr5vYijQSVv0EO8TF7zfoAdAaWC8jpVKK_nGSgAoyiQg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/#t





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux