Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/15] bpf: Support new sign-extension load insns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 7/18/23 5:15 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 23:07 -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
Add interpreter/jit support for new sign-extension load insns
which adds a new mode (BPF_MEMSX).
Also add verifier support to recognize these insns and to
do proper verification with new insns. In verifier, besides
to deduce proper bounds for the dst_reg, probed memory access
is handled by remembering insn mode in insn->imm field so later
on proper jit insns can be emitted.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c    |  32 ++++++++-
  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |   1 +
  kernel/bpf/core.c              |  13 ++++
  kernel/bpf/verifier.c          | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   1 +
  5 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 438adb695daa..addeea95f397 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -779,6 +779,29 @@ static void emit_ldx(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, int off)
  	*pprog = prog;
  }
+/* LDX: dst_reg = *(s8*)(src_reg + off) */
+static void emit_ldsx(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, int off)
+{
+	u8 *prog = *pprog;
+
+	switch (size) {
+	case BPF_B:
+		/* Emit 'movsx rax, byte ptr [rax + off]' */
+		EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0F, 0xBE);
+		break;
+	case BPF_H:
+		/* Emit 'movsx rax, word ptr [rax + off]' */
+		EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0F, 0xBF);
+		break;
+	case BPF_W:
+		/* Emit 'movsx rax, dword ptr [rax+0x14]' */
+		EMIT2(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x63);
+		break;
+	}
+	emit_insn_suffix(&prog, src_reg, dst_reg, off);
+	*pprog = prog;
+}
+
  /* STX: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = src_reg */
  static void emit_stx(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, int off)
  {
@@ -1370,6 +1393,9 @@ st:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
  		case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_W:
  		case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
  		case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_DW:
+		case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEMSX | BPF_B:
+		case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEMSX | BPF_H:
+		case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEMSX | BPF_W:
  			insn_off = insn->off;
if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) {
@@ -1415,7 +1441,11 @@ st:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
  				start_of_ldx = prog;
  				end_of_jmp[-1] = start_of_ldx - end_of_jmp;
  			}
-			emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), dst_reg, src_reg, insn_off);
+			if ((BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM && insn->imm == BPF_MEMSX) ||
+			    BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEMSX)
+				emit_ldsx(&prog, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), dst_reg, src_reg, insn_off);
+			else
+				emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), dst_reg, src_reg, insn_off);
  			if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) {
  				struct exception_table_entry *ex;
  				u8 *_insn = image + proglen + (start_of_ldx - temp);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 600d0caebbd8..c7196302d1eb 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
/* ld/ldx fields */
  #define BPF_DW		0x18	/* double word (64-bit) */
+#define BPF_MEMSX	0x80	/* load with sign extension */
  #define BPF_ATOMIC	0xc0	/* atomic memory ops - op type in immediate */
  #define BPF_XADD	0xc0	/* exclusive add - legacy name */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index dc85240a0134..8a1cc658789e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1610,6 +1610,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__bpf_call_base);
  	INSN_3(LDX, MEM, H),			\
  	INSN_3(LDX, MEM, W),			\
  	INSN_3(LDX, MEM, DW),			\
+	INSN_3(LDX, MEMSX, B),			\
+	INSN_3(LDX, MEMSX, H),			\
+	INSN_3(LDX, MEMSX, W),			\
  	/*   Immediate based. */		\
  	INSN_3(LD, IMM, DW)
@@ -1942,6 +1945,16 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
  	LDST(DW, u64)
  #undef LDST
+#define LDS(SIZEOP, SIZE) \
+	LDX_MEMSX_##SIZEOP:						\
+		DST = *(SIZE *)(unsigned long) (SRC + insn->off);	\
+		CONT;
+
+	LDS(B,   s8)
+	LDS(H,  s16)
+	LDS(W,  s32)
+#undef LDS
+
  #define ATOMIC_ALU_OP(BOP, KOP)						\
  		case BOP:						\
  			if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_W)		\
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 81a93eeac7a0..fbe4ca72d4c1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5795,6 +5795,77 @@ static void coerce_reg_to_size(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
  	__reg_combine_64_into_32(reg);
  }
+static void set_sext64_default_val(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
+{
+	if (size == 1) {
+		reg->smin_value = reg->s32_min_value = S8_MIN;
+		reg->smax_value = reg->s32_max_value = S8_MAX;
+	} else if (size == 2) {
+		reg->smin_value = reg->s32_min_value = S16_MIN;
+		reg->smax_value = reg->s32_max_value = S16_MAX;
+	} else {
+		/* size == 4 */
+		reg->smin_value = reg->s32_min_value = S32_MIN;
+		reg->smax_value = reg->s32_max_value = S32_MAX;
+	}
+	reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value = 0;
+	reg->umax_value = U64_MAX;
+	reg->u32_max_value = U32_MAX;
+	reg->var_off = tnum_unknown;
+}
+
+static void coerce_reg_to_size_sx(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
+{
+	u64 top_smax_value, top_smin_value;
+	s64 init_s64_max, init_s64_min, s64_max, s64_min;
+	u64 num_bits = size * 8;
+
+	top_smax_value = ((u64)reg->smax_value >> num_bits) << num_bits;
+	top_smin_value = ((u64)reg->smin_value >> num_bits) << num_bits;
+
+	if (top_smax_value != top_smin_value)
+		goto out;
+
+	/* find the s64_min and s64_min after sign extension */
+	if (size == 1) {
+		init_s64_max = (s8)reg->smax_value;
+		init_s64_min = (s8)reg->smin_value;
+	} else if (size == 2) {
+		init_s64_max = (s16)reg->smax_value;
+		init_s64_min = (s16)reg->smin_value;
+	} else {
+		/* size == 4 */
+		init_s64_max = (s32)reg->smax_value;
+		init_s64_min = (s32)reg->smin_value;
+	}
+
+	s64_max = max(init_s64_max, init_s64_min);
+	s64_min = min(init_s64_max, init_s64_min);
+
+	if (s64_max >= 0 && s64_min >= 0) {
+		reg->smin_value = reg->s32_min_value = s64_min;
+		reg->smax_value = reg->s32_max_value = s64_max;
+		reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value = s64_min;
+		reg->umax_value = reg->u32_max_value = s64_max;
+		reg->var_off = tnum_range(s64_min, s64_max);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (s64_min < 0 && s64_max < 0) {
+		reg->smin_value = reg->s32_min_value = s64_min;
+		reg->smax_value = reg->s32_max_value = s64_max;
+		reg->umin_value = (u64)s64_max;
+		reg->umax_value = (u64)s64_min;

I think the last two assignments are not correct for the following example:

{
	"testtesttest",
	.insns = {
		BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
		BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 0xff80, 2),
		BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, 0xffff, 1),
		{
			.code  = BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_X,
			.dst_reg = BPF_REG_0,
			.src_reg = BPF_REG_0,
			.off   = 8,
			.imm   = 0,
		},
		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
	},
	.result = ACCEPT,
	.retval = 0,
},

Here is execution log:

0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7 ; R0_w=Pscalar()
1: (a5) if r0 < 0xff80 goto pc+2   ; R0_w=Pscalar(umin=65408)
2: (25) if r0 > 0xffff goto pc+1   ; R0_w=Pscalar(umin=65408,umax=65535,var_off=(0xff80; 0x7f))
3: (bf) r0 = r0                    ; R0_w=Pscalar
                                       (smin=-128,smax=-1,
                                        umin=18'446'744'073'709'551'615,
                                        umax=18'446'744'073'709'551'488,
                                        var_off=(0xffffffffffffff80; 0x7f),
                                        u32_min=-1,u32_max=-128)
4: (95) exit

Note that umax < umin, which should not happen.
In this case the assignments in question are:

     reg->umin_value = (u64)s64_max; // == -1   == 0xffffffffffffffff
     reg->umax_value = (u64)s64_min; // == -128 == 0xffffffffffffff80

Thanks for pointing out. Yes, the assignment is incorrect and they are
mismatched. Will fix the issue and add a test for this.



+		reg->u32_min_value = (u32)s64_max;
+		reg->u32_max_value = (u32)s64_min;
+		reg->var_off = tnum_range((u64)s64_max, (u64)s64_min);
+		return;
+	}
+
+out:
+	set_sext64_default_val(reg, size);
+}
+
[...]




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux