Re: [Bpf] [PATCH 1/1] bpf, docs: Specify twos complement as format for signed integers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 2:58 PM Will Hawkins <hawkinsw@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In the documentation of the eBPF ISA it is unspecified how integers are
> represented. Specify that twos complement is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
> index 751e657973f0..63dfcba5eb9a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
> @@ -173,6 +173,11 @@ BPF_ARSH  0xc0   sign extending dst >>= (src & mask)
>  BPF_END   0xd0   byte swap operations (see `Byte swap instructions`_ below)
>  ========  =====  ==========================================================
>
> +eBPF supports 32- and 64-bit signed and unsigned integers. It does
> +not support floating-point data types. All signed integers are represented in
> +twos-complement format where the sign bit is stored in the most-significant
> +bit.

Could you point to another ISA document (like x86, arm, ...) that
talks about signed and unsigned integers?

-- 
Bpf mailing list
Bpf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux