Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 10:54:21 +0100 you wrote:
> At runtime, bpftool may run its own BPF programs to get the pids of
> processes referencing BPF programs, or to profile programs. The skeletons
> for these programs rely on a vmlinux.h header and may fail to compile when
> building bpftool on hosts running older kernels, where some structs or
> enums are not defined. In this set, we address this issue by using local
> definitions for struct perf_event, struct bpf_perf_link,
> BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT (pids.bpf.c) and struct bpf_perf_event_value
> (profiler.bpf.c).
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v2,1/4] bpftool: use a local copy of perf_event to fix accessing ::bpf_cookie
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4cbeeb0dc02f
- [bpf-next,v2,2/4] bpftool: define a local bpf_perf_link to fix accessing its fields
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/67a43462ee24
- [bpf-next,v2,3/4] bpftool: Use a local copy of BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT in pid_iter.bpf.c
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/44ba7b30e84f
- [bpf-next,v2,4/4] bpftool: use a local bpf_perf_event_value to fix accessing its fields
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/658ac0680131
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
