Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!

In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
to the old one? Thx!

> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
> >>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
> >>>>
> >>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
> >>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
> >>>>
> >>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
> >>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  samples/bpf/Makefile        | 8 ++++----
> >>>>  samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >>>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
> >>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >>>>  # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >>>>  # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >>>>  XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >>>> -		     -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >>>> +		     -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>
> >>> [..]
> >>>
> >>>>  		     -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >>>
> >>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
> >>
> >> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
> >> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
> >> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
> >> or should I remove this line?
> > 
> > You might have these headers installed on your system already if
> > it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
> > s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
> > 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>  		     -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >>>> -		     -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>> +		     -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>
> >>>>  $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >>>>  $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>  $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>>  	@echo "  CLANG-BPF " $@
> >>>>  	$(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >>>> -		-Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>> +		-Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>>  		-I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>>  		-I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >>>>  		-c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>
> >>>>  LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>>>
> >>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>>  BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >>>>  BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags   = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >>>>                   $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>>>
> >>>>  # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >>>> files
> >>>
> >>> [..]
> >>>
> >>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>
> >>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> >>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
> >>>
> >>>>  ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >>>>  _tprogc_flags   += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >>>>  endif
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> 2.34.1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Change from the original patch
> 
> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
> 
>  samples/bpf/Makefile        | 10 +++++-----
>  samples/bpf/Makefile.target |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>  # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>  # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>  XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> -		     -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> -		     -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> +		     -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> +		     -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
>  		     -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> -		     -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> +		     -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> 
>  $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>  $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>  $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>  	@echo "  CLANG-BPF " $@
>  	$(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> -		-Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> +		-Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>  		-I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>  		-I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>  		-c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> 
>  LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> 
> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>  BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>  BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> 
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags   = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>                   $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> 
>  # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> files

[..]

> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>  ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>  _tprogc_flags   += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>  endif

This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux