Hey John, We've been recently experimenting with using BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER and BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT with sockmap/sockhash to perform in-kernel parsing of RSocket frames. A very simple format ([0]) where the first 3 bytes specify the size of the frame payload. The idea was to collect the entire frame in the kernel before notifying user-space that data is available. This is meant to minimize unnecessary wakeups due to incomplete logical frames, saving CPU. You can find the BPF source code I've used at [1], it has lots of extra logging and stuff, but the idea is to read the first 3 bytes of each logical frame, and return the expected full frame size from the parser program. The verdict program always just returns SK_PASS. This seems to work exactly as expected in manual simulations of various packet size distributions, and even for a bunch of ping/pong-like benchmark (which are very sensitive to correct frame length determination, so I'm reasonably confident we don't screw that up much). And yet, when benchmarking sending multiple logical RPC streams over the same single socket (so many interleaving RSocket frames on single socket, but in terms of logical frames nothing should change), we often see that while full frame hasn't been accumulated in socket receive buffer yet, epoll_wait() for that socket would return with success notifying user space that there is data on socket. Subsequent recvfrom() call would immediately return -EAGAIN and no data, and our benchmark would go on this loop of useless epoll_wait()+recvfrom() calls back to back, many times over. So I have a few questions: - is the above use case something that was meant to be handled by sockmap+parser/verdict? - is it correct to assume that epoll won't wake up until amount of bytes requested by parser program is accumulated (this seems to be the case from manually experimenting with various "packet delays"); - is there some known bug or race in how sockmap and strparser framework interacts with epoll subsystem that could cause this weird epoll_wait() behavior? It does seem like some sort of timing issue, but I couldn't pin down exactly what are the conditions that this happens in. But it's quite reproducible with a pretty high frequency using our internal benchmark when multiple logical streams are involved. Any thoughts or suggestions? [0] https://rsocket.io/about/protocol/#framing-format [1] https://github.com/anakryiko/libbpf-bootstrap/blob/thrift-coalesce-rcvlowat/examples/c/bootstrap.bpf.c -- Andrii