Hi, On 7/6/2023 5:53 PM, Lu Hongfei wrote: > When wrapping code, use ';' better than using ',' which is more > in line with the coding habits of most engineers. > > Signed-off-by: Lu Hongfei <luhongfei@xxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c > index 3ca14ad36607..e1ee979e6acc 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c > @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static void perfbuf_libbpf_setup(void) > ctx->skel = perfbuf_setup_skeleton(); > > memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr)); > - attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT, > + attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT; > attr.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE; > attr.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_RAW; > /* notify only every Nth sample */ Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx> Please update the subject of the patch in v2. The subject should be something like: "[PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: xxxxxx" Just be curious. How do you find out the typo ? Is there any similar typos in bpf selftests and could you please fix these typos as well ?
