Re: [PATCHv3 bpf-next 21/26] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi bench test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:38 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Adding test that attaches 50k uprobes in uprobe_multi binary.
>
> After the attach is done we run the binary and make sure we
> get proper amount of hits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c        | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c        |  9 +++
>  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> index fd858636b8b0..547d46965d70 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,60 @@ static void test_link_api(void)
>         free(offsets);
>  }
>
> +static inline __u64 get_time_ns(void)
> +{
> +       struct timespec t;
> +
> +       clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &t);
> +       return (__u64) t.tv_sec * 1000000000 + t.tv_nsec;
> +}
> +

hmm.. I would expect we have this helper somewhere in common headers.
If not, we should probably move all such helpers into one header and
use it everywhere

> +static void test_bench_attach_uprobe(void)
> +{
> +       long attach_start_ns, attach_end_ns;
> +       long detach_start_ns, detach_end_ns;
> +       double attach_delta, detach_delta;
> +       struct uprobe_multi *skel = NULL;
> +       struct bpf_program *prog;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       skel = uprobe_multi__open();
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_multi__open"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, skel->obj)
> +               bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, false);
> +
> +       bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test_uprobe_bench, true);

I don't get why you bothered adding this test_uprobe_bench into
progs/uprobe_multi and go through this manual auto-load
setting/resetting, instead of just having test_uprobe_bench in a
separate skeleton?...

> +
> +       err = uprobe_multi__load(skel);
> +       if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "uprobe_multi__load"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       attach_start_ns = get_time_ns();
> +
> +       err = uprobe_multi__attach(skel);
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "uprobe_multi__attach"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       attach_end_ns = get_time_ns();
> +
> +       system("./uprobe_multi");
> +
> +       ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->count, 50000, "uprobes_count");
> +
> +cleanup:
> +       detach_start_ns = get_time_ns();
> +       uprobe_multi__destroy(skel);
> +       detach_end_ns = get_time_ns();
> +
> +       attach_delta = (attach_end_ns - attach_start_ns) / 1000000000.0;
> +       detach_delta = (detach_end_ns - detach_start_ns) / 1000000000.0;
> +
> +       printf("%s: attached in %7.3lfs\n", __func__, attach_delta);
> +       printf("%s: detached in %7.3lfs\n", __func__, detach_delta);

and for us lazy folks, what are the numbers you see on your machine?

> +}
> +
>  void test_uprobe_multi_test(void)
>  {
>         if (test__start_subtest("skel_api"))
> @@ -212,4 +266,6 @@ void test_uprobe_multi_test(void)
>                 test_attach_api_syms();
>         if (test__start_subtest("link_api"))
>                 test_link_api();
> +       if (test__start_subtest("bench_uprobe"))
> +               test_bench_attach_uprobe();
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
> index 1eeb9b7b9cad..cd73139dc881 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
> @@ -89,3 +89,12 @@ int test_uretprobe_sleep(struct pt_regs *ctx)
>         uprobe_multi_check(ctx, true, true);
>         return 0;
>  }
> +
> +int count;
> +
> +SEC("?uprobe.multi/./uprobe_multi:uprobe_multi_func_*")
> +int test_uprobe_bench(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> +{
> +       count++;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> --
> 2.41.0
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux