On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:00 AM Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:53 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > With the addition of support for fill_link_info to the kprobe_multi link, > > users will gain the ability to inspect it conveniently using the > > `bpftool link show`. This enhancement provides valuable information to the > > user, including the count of probed functions and their respective > > addresses. It's important to note that if the kptr_restrict setting is not > > permitted, the probed address will not be exposed, ensuring security. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > documentation nit, but otherwise LGTM > > Also, looking at other patch where you introduce bpf_copy_user(), > seems like we return -ENOSPC when user-provided memory is not big > enough. So let's change E2BIG in this patch to ENOSPC? Sure. Will change it. > > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for your review. > > > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++ > > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++ > > 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > > index 60a9d59beeab..512ba3ba2ed3 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > > @@ -6439,6 +6439,11 @@ struct bpf_link_info { > > __s32 priority; > > __u32 flags; > > } netfilter; > > + struct { > > + __aligned_u64 addrs; /* in/out: addresses buffer ptr */ > > addrs field itself is not modified, the memory it points to is > modified, so it's not really in/out per se, it is just a pointer to > memory where kernel stores output data Thanks for the explanation. Will change it. > > > + __u32 count; > > but count field itself is in/out, so please add a comment explicitly > stating this Will do it. -- Regards Yafang