Re: [PATCH bpf v1 0/2] Fix for check_max_stack_depth

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v1 0/2] Fix for check_max_stack_depth
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 19:19:28 -0700
Cc: bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230705144730.235802-1-memxor@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 7:47 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Fix for a bug in check_max_stack_depth which allows bypassing the
> 512-byte stack limit.

Applied. Thanks

References:
- [PATCH bpf v1 0/2] Fix for check_max_stack_depth
  - From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi

Prev by Date: Re: [v3 PATCH bpf-next 3/6] bpf: populate the per-cpu insertions/deletions counters for hashmaps
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/tsc: Add new BPF helper call bpf_rdtsc
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for check_stack_max_depth bug
Next by thread: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: add percpu stats for bpf_map
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux