Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 09/11] bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for perf_event

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/28/23 1:53 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
By introducing support for ->fill_link_info to the perf_event link, users
gain the ability to inspect it using `bpftool link show`. While the current
approach involves accessing this information via `bpftool perf show`,
consolidating link information for all link types in one place offers
greater convenience. Additionally, this patch extends support to the
generic perf event, which is not currently accommodated by
`bpftool perf show`. While only the perf type and config are exposed to
userspace, other attributes such as sample_period and sample_freq are
ignored. It's important to note that if kptr_restrict is not permitted, the
probed address will not be exposed, maintaining security measures.

A new enum bpf_perf_event_type is introduced to help the user understand
which struct is relevant.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  35 ++++++++++
  kernel/bpf/syscall.c           | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  35 ++++++++++
  3 files changed, 187 insertions(+)

For ease of review this should be squashed with the prior one which adds
bpf_perf_link_fill_common().

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 512ba3ba2ed3..7efe51672c15 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1057,6 +1057,16 @@ enum bpf_link_type {
  	MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE,
  };
+enum bpf_perf_event_type {
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_UNSPEC = 0,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE = 1,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE = 2,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE = 3,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE = 4,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT = 5,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_EVENT = 6,

Why explicitly defining the values of the enum?

+};
+
  /* cgroup-bpf attach flags used in BPF_PROG_ATTACH command
   *
   * NONE(default): No further bpf programs allowed in the subtree.
@@ -6444,6 +6454,31 @@ struct bpf_link_info {
  			__u32 count;
  			__u32 flags;
  		} kprobe_multi;
+		struct {
+			__u32 type; /* enum bpf_perf_event_type */
+			__u32 :32;
+			union {
+				struct {
+					__aligned_u64 file_name; /* in/out */
+					__u32 name_len;
+					__u32 offset;/* offset from file_name */

nit: spacing wrt comment, also same further below

+				} uprobe; /* BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE, BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE */
+				struct {
+					__aligned_u64 func_name; /* in/out */
+					__u32 name_len;
+					__u32 offset;/* offset from func_name */
+					__u64 addr;
+				} kprobe; /* BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE */
+				struct {
+					__aligned_u64 tp_name;   /* in/out */
+					__u32 name_len;
+				} tracepoint; /* BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT */
+				struct {
+					__u64 config;
+					__u32 type;
+				} event; /* BPF_PERF_EVENT_EVENT */
+			};
+		} perf_event;
  	};
  } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 72de91beabbc..05ff0a560f1a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3398,9 +3398,126 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_fill_common(const struct perf_event *event,
  	return 0;
  }
+#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS
+static int bpf_perf_link_fill_kprobe(const struct perf_event *event,
+				     struct bpf_link_info *info)
+{
+	char __user *uname;
+	u64 addr, offset;
+	u32 ulen, type;
+	int err;
+
+	uname = u64_to_user_ptr(info->perf_event.kprobe.func_name);
+	ulen = info->perf_event.kprobe.name_len;
+	err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, ulen, &offset, &addr,
+					&type);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+	if (type == BPF_FD_TYPE_KRETPROBE)
+		info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE;
+	else
+		info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE;
+
+	info->perf_event.kprobe.offset = offset;
+	if (!kallsyms_show_value(current_cred()))
+		addr = 0;
+	info->perf_event.kprobe.addr = addr;
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENTS
+static int bpf_perf_link_fill_uprobe(const struct perf_event *event,
+				     struct bpf_link_info *info)
+{
+	char __user *uname;
+	u64 addr, offset;
+	u32 ulen, type;
+	int err;
+
+	uname = u64_to_user_ptr(info->perf_event.uprobe.file_name);
+	ulen = info->perf_event.uprobe.name_len;
+	err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, ulen, &offset, &addr,
+					&type);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (type == BPF_FD_TYPE_URETPROBE)
+		info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE;
+	else
+		info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE;
+	info->perf_event.uprobe.offset = offset;
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static int bpf_perf_link_fill_probe(const struct perf_event *event,
+				    struct bpf_link_info *info)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS
+	if (event->tp_event->flags & TRACE_EVENT_FL_KPROBE)
+		return bpf_perf_link_fill_kprobe(event, info);
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENTS
+	if (event->tp_event->flags & TRACE_EVENT_FL_UPROBE)
+		return bpf_perf_link_fill_uprobe(event, info);
+#endif
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static int bpf_perf_link_fill_tracepoint(const struct perf_event *event,
+					 struct bpf_link_info *info)
+{
+	char __user *uname;
+	u64 addr, offset;
+	u32 ulen, type;
+
+	uname = u64_to_user_ptr(info->perf_event.tracepoint.tp_name);
+	ulen = info->perf_event.tracepoint.name_len;
+	info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT;
+	return bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, ulen, &offset, &addr,
+					 &type);

Perhaps for data we don't care about in these cases, passing NULL would be
more obvious and letting bpf_perf_link_fill_common() handle NULL inputs.

+}
+
+static int bpf_perf_link_fill_perf_event(const struct perf_event *event,
+					 struct bpf_link_info *info)
+{
+	info->perf_event.event.type = event->attr.type;
+	info->perf_event.event.config = event->attr.config;
+	info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_EVENT;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_perf_link_fill_link_info(const struct bpf_link *link,
+					struct bpf_link_info *info)
+{
+	struct bpf_perf_link *perf_link;
+	const struct perf_event *event;
+
+	perf_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_perf_link, link);
+	event = perf_get_event(perf_link->perf_file);
+	if (IS_ERR(event))
+		return PTR_ERR(event);
+
+	if (!event->prog)
+		return -EINVAL;

nit: In which situations do we run into this, would ENOENT be better error code
here given it's not an invalid arg that user passed to kernel for filling link
info.

+	switch (event->prog->type) {
+	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT:
+		return bpf_perf_link_fill_perf_event(event, info);
+	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT:
+		return bpf_perf_link_fill_tracepoint(event, info);
+	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE:
+		return bpf_perf_link_fill_probe(event, info);
+	default:
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+}
+
  static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_perf_link_lops = {
  	.release = bpf_perf_link_release,
  	.dealloc = bpf_perf_link_dealloc,
+	.fill_link_info = bpf_perf_link_fill_link_info,
  };
static int bpf_perf_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 512ba3ba2ed3..7efe51672c15 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1057,6 +1057,16 @@ enum bpf_link_type {
  	MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE,
  };
+enum bpf_perf_event_type {
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_UNSPEC = 0,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE = 1,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE = 2,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE = 3,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE = 4,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT = 5,
+	BPF_PERF_EVENT_EVENT = 6,
+};
+
  /* cgroup-bpf attach flags used in BPF_PROG_ATTACH command
   *
   * NONE(default): No further bpf programs allowed in the subtree.
@@ -6444,6 +6454,31 @@ struct bpf_link_info {
  			__u32 count;
  			__u32 flags;
  		} kprobe_multi;
+		struct {
+			__u32 type; /* enum bpf_perf_event_type */
+			__u32 :32;
+			union {
+				struct {
+					__aligned_u64 file_name; /* in/out */
+					__u32 name_len;
+					__u32 offset;/* offset from file_name */
+				} uprobe; /* BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE, BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE */
+				struct {
+					__aligned_u64 func_name; /* in/out */
+					__u32 name_len;
+					__u32 offset;/* offset from func_name */
+					__u64 addr;
+				} kprobe; /* BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE */
+				struct {
+					__aligned_u64 tp_name;   /* in/out */
+					__u32 name_len;
+				} tracepoint; /* BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT */
+				struct {
+					__u64 config;
+					__u32 type;
+				} event; /* BPF_PERF_EVENT_EVENT */
+			};
+		} perf_event;
  	};
  } __attribute__((aligned(8)));





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux