Re: [PATCH v2] btf: warn but return no error for NULL btf from __register_btf_kfunc_id_set()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btf: warn but return no error for NULL btf from __register_btf_kfunc_id_set()
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 18:51:03 +0200
Cc: martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx, Alexander.Egorenkov@xxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, memxor@xxxxxxxxx, olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230630210251.126928-1-sj@kernel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2

On 6/30/23 11:02 PM, SeongJae Park wrote:
[...]

Also, please note that this will not cleanly applicable on 6.1.y.  I will
provide the backport to stable@ as soon as this is merged into the mainline.


Perfect, thanks!

References:
- Re: [PATCH v2] btf: warn but return no error for NULL btf from __register_btf_kfunc_id_set()
  - From: SeongJae Park

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf, arm64: use BPF prog pack allocator in BPF JIT
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] btf: warn but return no error for NULL btf from __register_btf_kfunc_id_set()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] btf: warn but return no error for NULL btf from __register_btf_kfunc_id_set()
Next by thread: [ANN] bpf development stats for 6.5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux