On 2023/6/29 22:26, Alexander Lobakin wrote: >> v5 RFC: add a new page_pool_cache_alloc() API, and other minor >> change as discussed in v4. As there seems to be three >> comsumers that might be made use of the new API, so >> repost it as RFC and CC the relevant authors to see >> if the new API fits their need. > > Tested v5 against my latest tree, no regressions, perf is even a bit > better than it was. That also might've come from that net-next pulled > Linus' tree with a good bunch of PRs already merged, or from v4 -> v5 > update. v4 -> v5 is mostly about adding the page pool cache API, so I believe the perf improvement is from the net-next pull:) > > Re consumers, I'm planning to send the RFC series with IAVF as a > consumer on Monday (and a couple generic Page Pool improvements today, > will see). Thanks.