[PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix an error around PTR_UNTRUSTED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Per discussion with Alexei, the PTR_UNTRUSTED flag should not been
cleared when we start to walk a new struct, because the struct in
question may be a struct nested in a union. We should also check and set
this flag before we walk its each member, in case itself is a union.

Fixes: 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 29fe21099298..e0a493230727 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -6133,7 +6133,6 @@ static int btf_struct_walk(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
 	const char *tname, *mname, *tag_value;
 	u32 vlen, elem_id, mid;
 
-	*flag = 0;
 again:
 	tname = __btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
 	if (!btf_type_is_struct(t)) {
@@ -6142,6 +6141,14 @@ static int btf_struct_walk(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
 	}
 
 	vlen = btf_type_vlen(t);
+	if (BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_UNION && vlen != 1)
+		/*
+		 * walking unions yields untrusted pointers
+		 * with exception of __bpf_md_ptr and other
+		 * unions with a single member
+		 */
+		*flag |= PTR_UNTRUSTED;
+
 	if (off + size > t->size) {
 		/* If the last element is a variable size array, we may
 		 * need to relax the rule.
@@ -6302,15 +6309,6 @@ static int btf_struct_walk(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
 		 * of this field or inside of this struct
 		 */
 		if (btf_type_is_struct(mtype)) {
-			if (BTF_INFO_KIND(mtype->info) == BTF_KIND_UNION &&
-			    btf_type_vlen(mtype) != 1)
-				/*
-				 * walking unions yields untrusted pointers
-				 * with exception of __bpf_md_ptr and other
-				 * unions with a single member
-				 */
-				*flag |= PTR_UNTRUSTED;
-
 			/* our field must be inside that union or struct */
 			t = mtype;
 
@@ -6476,7 +6474,7 @@ bool btf_struct_ids_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 			  bool strict)
 {
 	const struct btf_type *type;
-	enum bpf_type_flag flag;
+	enum bpf_type_flag flag = 0;
 	int err;
 
 	/* Are we already done? */
-- 
2.39.3





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux