On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 01:39:54PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:37 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Adding elf_find_multi_func_offset function that looks up > > offsets for symbols specified in syms array argument. > > > > Offsets are returned in allocated array with the 'cnt' size, > > that needs to be released by the caller. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 + > > 2 files changed, 114 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > index 30d9e3b69114..1c310b718961 100644 > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > @@ -11053,6 +11053,118 @@ static long elf_find_func_offset(Elf *elf, const char *binary_path, const char * > > return ret; > > } > > > > +struct elf_symbol_offset { > > + const char *name; > > + unsigned long offset; > > + int bind; > > + int idx; > > +}; > > + > > +static int cmp_func_offset(const void *_a, const void *_b) > > +{ > > + const struct elf_symbol_offset *a = _a; > > + const struct elf_symbol_offset *b = _b; > > + > > + return strcmp(a->name, b->name); > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +__elf_find_multi_func_offset(Elf *elf, const char *binary_path, int cnt, > > + const char **syms, unsigned long **poffsets) > > +{ > > + int sh_types[2] = { SHT_DYNSYM, SHT_SYMTAB }; > > + struct elf_symbol_offset *func_offs; > > + int err = 0, i, idx, cnt_done = 0; > > + unsigned long *offsets = NULL; > > + > > + func_offs = calloc(cnt, sizeof(*func_offs)); > > + if (!func_offs) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) { > > + func_offs[i].name = syms[i]; > > + func_offs[i].idx = i; > > + } > > + > > + qsort(func_offs, cnt, sizeof(*func_offs), cmp_func_offset); > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sh_types); i++) { > > + struct elf_symbol_iter iter; > > + struct elf_symbol *sym; > > + > > + if (elf_symbol_iter_new(&iter, elf, binary_path, sh_types[i])) > > a bit lax handling of initialization errors here, let's be a bit more > strict here? right, I'll have elf_symbol_iter_new return -ENOENT in case there's no 'sh_types[i]' section type (and we want to try next section type) and fail otherwise > > > + continue; > > + > > + while ((sym = elf_symbol_iter_next(&iter))) { > > + struct elf_symbol_offset *fo, tmp = { > > + .name = sym->name, > > + }; > > + > > + fo = bsearch(&tmp, func_offs, cnt, sizeof(*func_offs), > > + cmp_func_offset); > > + if (!fo) > > + continue; > > + > > + if (fo->offset > 0) { > > + /* same offset, no problem */ > > + if (fo->offset == sym->offset) > > + continue; > > + /* handle multiple matches */ > > + if (fo->bind != STB_WEAK && sym->bind != STB_WEAK) { > > + /* Only accept one non-weak bind. */ > > + pr_warn("elf: ambiguous match for '%s', '%s' in '%s'\n", > > + sym->name, fo->name, binary_path); > > + err = -LIBBPF_ERRNO__FORMAT; > > + goto out; > > + } else if (sym->bind == STB_WEAK) { > > + /* already have a non-weak bind, and > > + * this is a weak bind, so ignore. > > + */ > > + continue; > > + } > > + } > > + if (!fo->offset) > > + cnt_done++; > > + fo->offset = sym->offset; > > + fo->bind = sym->bind; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + if (cnt != cnt_done) { > > + err = -ENOENT; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + offsets = calloc(cnt, sizeof(*offsets)); > > you can allocate it at the very beginning and fill it out based on > fo->idx, there is no need to store offset in elf_symbol_offset true, will fix > > > + if (!offsets) { > > + err = -ENOMEM; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) { > > + idx = func_offs[i].idx; > > + offsets[idx] = func_offs[i].offset; > > + } > > + > > +out: > > + *poffsets = offsets; > > + free(func_offs); > > + return err; > > +} > > + > > +int elf_find_multi_func_offset(const char *binary_path, int cnt, > > + const char **syms, unsigned long **poffsets) > > +{ > > + struct elf_fd elf_fd = {}; > > do you need to initialize this struct? I recall getting gcc warn/error, which I can't see anymore ;-) will remove > > > + long ret = -ENOENT; > > same here, you always override ret, so no need to init it? yes > > > + > > + ret = open_elf(binary_path, &elf_fd); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + ret = __elf_find_multi_func_offset(elf_fd.elf, binary_path, cnt, syms, poffsets); > > is there a point of having elf_find_multi_func_offset and > __elf_find_multi_func_offset separately? can you please combine? ok thanks, jirka