Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 02/24] bpf: Add cookies support for uprobe_multi link

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 05:18:10PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:36 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Adding support to specify cookies array for uprobe_multi link.
> >
> > The cookies array share indexes and length with other uprobe_multi
> > arrays (offsets/ref_ctr_offsets).
> >
> > The cookies[i] value defines cookie for i-the uprobe and will be
> > returned by bpf_get_attach_cookie helper when called from ebpf
> > program hooked to that specific uprobe.
> >
> > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  1 +
> >  kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |  2 +-
> >  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c       | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  1 +
> >  4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> [...]
> 
> > @@ -3026,6 +3045,16 @@ uprobe_multi_link_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, unsigned long func, s
> >         return uprobe_prog_run(uprobe, func, regs);
> >  }
> >
> > +static u64 bpf_uprobe_multi_cookie(struct bpf_run_ctx *ctx)
> > +{
> > +       struct bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx *run_ctx;
> > +
> > +       if (!ctx)
> > +               return 0;
> 
> can't happen, let's crash if it does happen?

ok, will remove

jirka

> 
> 
> > +       run_ctx = container_of(current->bpf_ctx, struct bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx, run_ctx);
> > +       return run_ctx->uprobe->cookie;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> [...]




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux