On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:11:15AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:35:27AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > +static int uprobe_prog_run(struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe,
> > + unsigned long entry_ip,
> > + struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > + struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link *link = uprobe->link;
> > + struct bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx run_ctx = {
> > + .entry_ip = entry_ip,
> > + };
> > + struct bpf_prog *prog = link->link.prog;
> > + struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx;
> > + int err = 0;
> > +
> > + might_fault();
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock_trace();
> > + migrate_disable();
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(__this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_prog_active) != 1))
> > + goto out;
>
> bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable() doesn't do such things.
> Such 'proteciton' will actively hurt.
> The sleepable prog below will block all kprobes on this cpu.
> please remove.
ok makes sense, can't recall the reason why I added it
jirka
>
> > +
> > + old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx);
> > +
> > + if (!prog->aux->sleepable)
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > +
> > + err = bpf_prog_run(link->link.prog, regs);
> > +
> > + if (!prog->aux->sleepable)
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > + bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx);
> > +
> > +out:
> > + __this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
> > + migrate_enable();
> > + rcu_read_unlock_trace();
> > + return err;
