On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:31:19 -0700 Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > Timestamp might be a bit of an outlier here where it's just setting > some bit in some existing descriptor. > For some features, the drivers might have to reserve extra descriptors > and I'm not sure how safe it would be to let the programs arbitrarily > mess with the descriptor queues like that. I was gonna say, most NICs will have some form of descriptor chaining, with strict ordering, to perform reasonably with small packets. > I'll probably keep this kfunc approach for v2 rfc for now (will try to > get rid of the complicated attachment at least), but let's keep > discussing. SGTM, FWIW.
