Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/10] bpftool: Show probed function in kprobe_multi link info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2023-06-14 10:42 UTC+0800 ~ Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 6:36 AM Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/12/23 08:16, Yafang Shao wrote:
>>> Show the already expose kprobe_multi link info in bpftool. The result as
>>> follows,
>>>
>>> 52: kprobe_multi  prog 381
>>>          retprobe 0  func_cnt 7
>>>          addrs ffffffff9ec44f20  funcs schedule_timeout_interruptible
>>>                ffffffff9ec44f60        schedule_timeout_killable
>>>                ffffffff9ec44fa0        schedule_timeout_uninterruptible
>>>                ffffffff9ec44fe0        schedule_timeout_idle
>>>                ffffffffc09468d0        xfs_trans_get_efd [xfs]
>>>                ffffffffc0953a10        xfs_trans_get_buf_map [xfs]
>>>                ffffffffc0957320        xfs_trans_get_dqtrx [xfs]
>>>          pids kprobe_multi(559862)
>>> 53: kprobe_multi  prog 381
>>>          retprobe 1  func_cnt 7
>>>          addrs ffffffff9ec44f20  funcs schedule_timeout_interruptible
>>>                ffffffff9ec44f60        schedule_timeout_killable
>>>                ffffffff9ec44fa0        schedule_timeout_uninterruptible
>>>                ffffffff9ec44fe0        schedule_timeout_idle
>>>                ffffffffc09468d0        xfs_trans_get_efd [xfs]
>>>                ffffffffc0953a10        xfs_trans_get_buf_map [xfs]
>>>                ffffffffc0957320        xfs_trans_get_dqtrx [xfs]
>>>          pids kprobe_multi(559862)
>>>
>>> $ tools/bpf/bpftool/bpftool link show -j
>>> [{"id":52,"type":"kprobe_multi","prog_id":381,"retprobe":0,"func_cnt":7,"funcs":[{"addr":18446744072078249760,"func":"schedule_timeout_interruptible","module":""},{"addr":18446744072078249824,"func":"schedule_timeout_killable","module":""},{"addr":18446744072078249888,"func":"schedule_timeout_uninterruptible","module":""},{"addr":18446744072078249952,"func":"schedule_timeout_idle","module":""},{"addr":18446744072645535952,"func":"xfs_trans_get_efd","module":"[xfs]"},{"addr":18446744072645589520,"func":"xfs_trans_get_buf_map","module":"[xfs]"},{"addr":18446744072645604128,"func":"xfs_trans_get_dqtrx","module":"[xfs]"}],"pids":[{"pid":559862,"comm":"kprobe_multi"}]},{"id":53,"type":"kprobe_multi","prog_id":381,"retprobe":1,"func_cnt":7,"funcs":[{"addr":18446744072078249760,"func":"schedule_timeout_interruptible","module":""},{"addr":18446744072078249824,"func":"schedule_timeout_killable","module":""},{"addr":18446744072078249888,"func":"schedule_timeout_uninterruptible","module":""},{"addr":18446744072078249952,"func":"schedule_timeout_idle","module":""},{"addr":18446744072645535952,"func":"xfs_trans_get_efd","module":"[xfs]"},{"addr":18446744072645589520,"func":"xfs_trans_get_buf_map","module":"[xfs]"},{"addr":18446744072645604128,"func":"xfs_trans_get_dqtrx","module":"[xfs]"}],"pids":[{"pid":559862,"comm":"kprobe_multi"}]}]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c
>>> index 2d78607..0015582 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c
>>> @@ -14,8 +14,10 @@
>>>
>>>   #include "json_writer.h"
>>>   #include "main.h"
>>> +#include "xlated_dumper.h"
>>>
>>>   static struct hashmap *link_table;
>>> +static struct dump_data dd = {};
>>>
>>>   static int link_parse_fd(int *argc, char ***argv)
>>>   {
>>> @@ -166,6 +168,45 @@ static int get_prog_info(int prog_id, struct bpf_prog_info *info)
>>>       return err;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> +static int cmp_u64(const void *A, const void *B)
>>> +{
>>> +     const __u64 *a = A, *b = B;
>>> +
>>> +     return *a - *b;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void
>>> +show_kprobe_multi_json(struct bpf_link_info *info, json_writer_t *wtr)
>>> +{
>>> +     __u32 i, j = 0;
>>> +     __u64 *addrs;
>>> +
>>> +     jsonw_uint_field(json_wtr, "retprobe",
>>> +                      info->kprobe_multi.flags & BPF_F_KPROBE_MULTI_RETURN);
>>> +     jsonw_uint_field(json_wtr, "func_cnt", info->kprobe_multi.count);
>>> +     jsonw_name(json_wtr, "funcs");
>>> +     jsonw_start_array(json_wtr);
>>> +     addrs = (__u64 *)u64_to_ptr(info->kprobe_multi.addrs);
>>> +     qsort((void *)addrs, info->kprobe_multi.count, sizeof(__u64), cmp_u64);
>>> +
>>> +     /* Load it once for all. */
>>> +     if (!dd.sym_count)
>>> +             kernel_syms_load(&dd);
>>> +     for (i = 0; i < dd.sym_count; i++) {
>>> +             if (dd.sym_mapping[i].address != addrs[j])
>>> +                     continue;
>>> +             jsonw_start_object(json_wtr);
>>> +             jsonw_uint_field(json_wtr, "addr", dd.sym_mapping[i].address);
>>> +             jsonw_string_field(json_wtr, "func", dd.sym_mapping[i].name);
>>> +             /* Print none if it is vmlinux */
>>> +             jsonw_string_field(json_wtr, "module", dd.sym_mapping[i].module);
>>> +             jsonw_end_object(json_wtr);
>>> +             if (j++ == info->kprobe_multi.count)
>>> +                     break;
>>> +     }
>>> +     jsonw_end_array(json_wtr);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static int show_link_close_json(int fd, struct bpf_link_info *info)
>>>   {
>>>       struct bpf_prog_info prog_info;
>>> @@ -218,6 +259,9 @@ static int show_link_close_json(int fd, struct bpf_link_info *info)
>>>               jsonw_uint_field(json_wtr, "map_id",
>>>                                info->struct_ops.map_id);
>>>               break;
>>> +     case BPF_LINK_TYPE_KPROBE_MULTI:
>>> +             show_kprobe_multi_json(info, json_wtr);
>>> +             break;
>>>       default:
>>>               break;
>>>       }
>>> @@ -351,6 +395,44 @@ void netfilter_dump_plain(const struct bpf_link_info *info)
>>>               printf(" flags 0x%x", info->netfilter.flags);
>>>   }
>>>
>>> +static void show_kprobe_multi_plain(struct bpf_link_info *info)
>>> +{
>>> +     __u32 i, j = 0;
>>> +     __u64 *addrs;
>>> +
>>> +     if (!info->kprobe_multi.count)
>>> +             return;
>>> +
>>> +     printf("\n\tretprobe %d  func_cnt %u  ",
>>> +            info->kprobe_multi.flags & BPF_F_KPROBE_MULTI_RETURN,
>>> +            info->kprobe_multi.count);
>>> +     addrs = (__u64 *)u64_to_ptr(info->kprobe_multi.addrs);
>>> +     qsort((void *)addrs, info->kprobe_multi.count, sizeof(__u64), cmp_u64);
>>> +
>>> +     /* Load it once for all. */
>>> +     if (!dd.sym_count)
>>> +             kernel_syms_load(&dd);
>>> +     for (i = 0; i < dd.sym_count; i++) {
>>> +             if (dd.sym_mapping[i].address != addrs[j])
>>> +                     continue;
>>> +             if (!j)
>>> +                     printf("\n\taddrs %016lx  funcs %s",
>>> +                            dd.sym_mapping[i].address,
>>> +                            dd.sym_mapping[i].name);
>>> +             else
>>> +                     printf("\n\t      %016lx        %s",
>>> +                            dd.sym_mapping[i].address,
>>> +                            dd.sym_mapping[i].name);
>>> +             if (dd.sym_mapping[i].module[0] != '\0')
>>> +                     printf(" %s  ", dd.sym_mapping[i].module);
>>> +             else
>>> +                     printf("  ");
>>
>> Could you explain what these extra spaces after module names are for?
> 
> There are two spaces. We use two spaces to seperate different items
> printed in bpftool. For example,
>   "4: kprobe_multi  prog 16"
> There are two spaces between the "type" and the "prog".
> 
> We always print these two spaces after one item is printed:
>   printf("type %u  ", info->type);
>   printf("prog %u  ", info->prog_id);
> That way, we can add new item easily and consistently.
> 

I'm not sure we _always_ do it at the end of lines, but it seems to be
rather consistent in link.c at least. For my part I don't know if this
printf("  ") is really necessary - I'd rather avoid spaces at the end of
lines, but then there would be several other locations to update. So I
don't have any objection, either.

Quentin





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux