On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 16:28:49 -0700 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If Steven would be ok with it, can we land this change through the > bpf-next tree? Then we can have BPF selftest added in the same patch > set that parses a new file and uses bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi() > to attach using explicit addresses. > > This should make it clear to everyone how this is meant to be used and > will be a good test that everything works end-to-end. > This touches some of the code I'm working with, so I rather have it be in my tree. -- Steve
