Em Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 04:52:40PM +0300, Eduard Zingerman escreveu:
> On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 10:42 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, May 26, 2023 at 02:59:49AM +0300, Eduard Zingerman escreveu:
> > > When pahole is executed in '-F dwarf --sort' mode there are two places
> > > where 'struct structure' instance could be added to the rb_tree:
> > >
> > > The first is triggered from the following call stack:
> > >
> > > print_classes()
> > > structures__add()
> > > __structures__add()
> > > (adds to global pahole.c:structures__tree)
> > >
> > > The second is triggered from the following call stack:
> > >
> > > print_ordered_classes()
> > > resort_classes()
> > > resort_add()
> > > (adds to local rb_tree instance)
> > >
> > > Both places use the same 'struct structure::rb_node' field, so if both
> > > code pathes are executed the final state of the 'structures__tree'
> > > might be inconsistent.
> > >
> > > For example, this could be observed when DEBUG_CHECK_LEAKS build flag
> > > is set. Here is the command line snippet that eventually leads to a
> > > segfault:
> > >
> > > $ for i in $(seq 1 100); do \
> > > echo $i; \
> > > pahole -F dwarf --flat_arrays --sort --jobs vmlinux > /dev/null \
> > > || break; \
> > > done
> > >
> > > GDB shows the following stack trace:
> > >
> > > Thread 1 "pahole" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > 0x00007ffff7f819ad in __rb_erase_color (node=0x7fffd4045830, parent=0x0, root=0x5555555672d8 <structures.tree>) at /home/eddy/work/dwarves-fork/rbtree.c:134
> > > 134 if (parent->rb_left == node)
> > > (gdb) bt
> > > #0 0x00007ffff7f819ad in __rb_erase_color (node=0x7fffd4045830, parent=0x0, root=0x5555555672d8 <structures.tree>) at /home/eddy/work/dwarves-fork/rbtree.c:134
> > > #1 0x00007ffff7f82014 in rb_erase (node=0x7fff21ae5b80, root=0x5555555672d8 <structures.tree>) at /home/eddy/work/dwarves-fork/rbtree.c:275
> > > #2 0x0000555555559c3d in __structures__delete () at /home/eddy/work/dwarves-fork/pahole.c:440
> > > #3 0x0000555555559c70 in structures__delete () at /home/eddy/work/dwarves-fork/pahole.c:448
> > > #4 0x0000555555560bb6 in main (argc=13, argv=0x7fffffffdcd8) at /home/eddy/work/dwarves-fork/pahole.c:3584
> > >
> > > This commit modifies resort_classes() to re-use 'structures__tree' and
> > > to reset 'rb_node' fields before adding structure instances to the
> > > tree for a second time.
> > >
> > > Lock/unlock structures_lock to be consistent with structures_add() and
> > > structures__delete() code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > pahole.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/pahole.c b/pahole.c
> > > index 6fc4ed6..576733f 100644
> > > --- a/pahole.c
> > > +++ b/pahole.c
> > > @@ -621,9 +621,9 @@ static void print_classes(struct cu *cu)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void __print_ordered_classes(struct rb_root *root)
> > > +static void __print_ordered_classes(void)
> > > {
> > > - struct rb_node *next = rb_first(root);
> > > + struct rb_node *next = rb_first(&structures__tree);
> > >
> > > while (next) {
> > > struct structure *st = rb_entry(next, struct structure, rb_node);
> > > @@ -660,24 +660,39 @@ static void resort_add(struct rb_root *resorted, struct structure *str)
> > > rb_insert_color(&str->rb_node, resorted);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void resort_classes(struct rb_root *resorted, struct list_head *head)
> > > +static void resort_classes(void)
> > > {
> > > struct structure *str;
> > >
> > > - list_for_each_entry(str, head, node)
> > > - resort_add(resorted, str);
> > > + pthread_mutex_lock(&structures_lock);
> > > +
> > > + /* The need_resort flag is set by type__compare_members()
> > > + * within the following call stack:
> > > + *
> > > + * print_classes()
> > > + * structures__add()
> > > + * __structures__add()
> > > + * type__compare()
> > > + *
> > > + * The call to structures__add() registers 'struct structures'
> > > + * instances in both 'structures__tree' and 'structures__list'.
> > > + * In order to avoid adding same node to the tree twice reset
> > > + * both the 'structures__tree' and 'str->rb_node'.
> > > + */
> > > + structures__tree = RB_ROOT;
> > > + list_for_each_entry(str, &structures__list, node) {
> > > + bzero(&str->rb_node, sizeof(str->rb_node));
> >
> > Why is this bzero needed?
> >
> > > + resort_add(&structures__tree, str);
> >
> > resort_add will call rb_link_node(&str->rb_node, parent, p); and it, in
> > turn:
> >
> > static inline void rb_link_node(struct rb_node * node, struct rb_node * parent,
> > struct rb_node ** rb_link)
> > {
> > node->rb_parent_color = (unsigned long )parent;
> > node->rb_left = node->rb_right = NULL;
> >
> > *rb_link = node;
> > }
> >
> > And:
> >
> > struct rb_node
> > {
> > unsigned long rb_parent_color;
> > #define RB_RED 0
> > #define RB_BLACK 1
> > struct rb_node *rb_right;
> > struct rb_node *rb_left;
> > } __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long))))
> >
> > So all the fields are being initialized in the operation right after the
> > bzero(), no?
>
> Right, you are correct.
> The 'structures__tree = RB_ROOT' part is still necessary, though.
> If you are ok with overall structure of the patch I can resend it w/o bzero().
Humm, so basically this boils down to the following patch?
- Arnaldo
diff --git a/pahole.c b/pahole.c
index 6fc4ed6a721b97ab..7f7aa0a5db05837d 100644
--- a/pahole.c
+++ b/pahole.c
@@ -674,7 +674,12 @@ static void print_ordered_classes(void)
__print_ordered_classes(&structures__tree);
} else {
struct rb_root resorted = RB_ROOT;
-
+#ifdef DEBUG_CHECK_LEAKS
+ // We'll delete structures from structures__tree, since we're
+ // adding them to ther resorted list, better not keep
+ // references there.
+ structures__tree = RB_ROOT;
+#endif
resort_classes(&resorted, &structures__list);
__print_ordered_classes(&resorted);
}
