Re: [PATCH v7] libbpf: kprobe.multi: Filter with available_filter_functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





在 2023/5/30 11:44, Ratheesh Kannoth 写道:
From: Jackie Liu <liu.yun@xxxxxxxxx>

+
+	if (!glob_match(sym_name, res->pattern))
+		return 0;
+
+	err = libbpf_ensure_mem((void **) &res->syms, &res->cap,
+				sizeof(const char *), res->cnt + 1);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	name = strdup(sym_name);
+	if (!name)
+		return -errno;
+
+	res->syms[res->cnt++] = name;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+typedef int (*available_kprobe_cb_t)(const char *sym_name, void *ctx);
+
+static int
+libbpf_available_kprobes_parse(available_kprobe_cb_t cb, void *ctx)
+{
+	char sym_name[256];
+	FILE *f;
+	int ret, err = 0;
+	const char *available_path = tracefs_available_filter_functions();
Dont we need to follow reverse x-mas tree ?

+
+	f = fopen(available_path, "r");
+	if (!f) {
+		err = -errno;
+		pr_warn("failed to open %s, fallback to /proc/kallsyms.\n",
+			available_path);
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	while (true) {
+		ret = fscanf(f, "%255s%*[^\n]\n", sym_name);
+		if (ret == EOF && feof(f))
+			break;
why fscanf() is not setting EOF. Why did you use feof() ?

The fscanf function returns EOF (End of File) when one of the following conditions is met:

End of file is reached: When fscanf reaches the end of the file being read, it returns EOF. This indicates that there are no more characters to read from the file.

Input error occurs: If fscanf encounters an error while reading input, such as a format mismatch or inability to read the expected data type, it returns EOF.

Stream error occurs: If an error occurs with the stream itself, such as an error in the underlying file system or I/O error, fscanf may return EOF.

--
Jackie Liu


+		if (ret != 1) {
+			pr_warn("failed to read available kprobe entry: %d\n",
+				ret);
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		err = cb(sym_name, ctx);
+		if (err)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	fclose(f);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void kprobe_multi_resolve_free(struct kprobe_multi_resolve *res)
+{
+	while (res->syms && res->cnt)
+		free((char *)res->syms[--res->cnt]);
+
+	free(res->syms);
+	free(res->addrs);

it looks odd to do allocation in libbpf_xxx (libbpf_ensure_mem ) function and
freeing in a static function.

+
+	/* reset to zero, when fallback */
+	res->cap = 0;
+	res->cnt = 0;
+	res->syms = NULL;
+	res->addrs = NULL;
+}
+
struct bpf_link *
bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
				      const char *pattern,
@@ -10476,13 +10558,21 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
		return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);

	if (pattern) {
-		err = libbpf_kallsyms_parse(resolve_kprobe_multi_cb, &res);
-		if (err)
-			goto error;
+		err = libbpf_available_kprobes_parse(ftrace_resolve_kprobe_multi_cb,
+						     &res);
+		if (err) {
+			/* fallback to kallsyms */
+			kprobe_multi_resolve_free(&res);
+			err = libbpf_kallsyms_parse(kallsyms_resolve_kprobe_multi_cb,
+						    &res);
+			if (err)
+				goto error;
+		}
		if (!res.cnt) {
			err = -ENOENT;
			goto error;
		}
+		syms = res.syms;
		addrs = res.addrs;
		cnt = res.cnt;
	}
@@ -10511,12 +10601,12 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
		goto error;
	}
	link->fd = link_fd;
-	free(res.addrs);
+	kprobe_multi_resolve_free(&res);
	return link;

error:
	free(link);
-	free(res.addrs);
+	kprobe_multi_resolve_free(&res);
	return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
}

--
2.25.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux