Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix dynptr/test_dynptr_is_null

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Tue, 16 May 2023 21:04:04 -0700 you wrote:
> With latest llvm17, dynptr/test_dynptr_is_null subtest failed in my
> testing VM. The failure log looks like below:
>   All error logs:
>   tester_init:PASS:tester_log_buf 0 nsec
>   process_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec
>   process_subtest:PASS:Can't alloc specs array 0 nsec
>   verify_success:PASS:dynptr_success__open 0 nsec
>   verify_success:PASS:bpf_object__find_program_by_name 0 nsec
>   verify_success:PASS:dynptr_success__load 0 nsec
>   verify_success:PASS:bpf_program__attach 0 nsec
>   verify_success:FAIL:err unexpected err: actual 4 != expected 0
>   #65/9    dynptr/test_dynptr_is_null:FAIL
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix dynptr/test_dynptr_is_null
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/12852f8e0f70
  - [bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: Make bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly() prototyype consistent with kernel
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/effcf6241624

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux