Re: [RFC PATCH] bpf: Remove in_atomic() from bpf_link_put().

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-05-16 22:26:01 [-0700], Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Sebastian,
Hi Alexei,

> Andrii is correct. We cannot do this unconditionally,
> but we can do it for IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
> if it's causing issues on RT, but BPF users won't be happy
> with non deterministic prog detach.
> Do you see a different way of solving it?

Yes. I've been distracted with other things, I get back to it.

Sebastian




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux