The BPF CO-RE's ignore suffix rule requires three underscores. Otherwise it'd fail like below: $ sudo perf lock contention -ab libbpf: prog 'collect_lock_syms': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument libbpf: prog 'collect_lock_syms': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- reg type unsupported for arg#0 function collect_lock_syms#380 ; int BPF_PROG(collect_lock_syms) 0: (b7) r6 = 0 ; R6_w=0 1: (b7) r7 = 0 ; R7_w=0 2: (b7) r9 = 1 ; R9_w=1 3: <invalid CO-RE relocation> failed to resolve CO-RE relocation <byte_off> [381] struct rq__new.__lock (0:0 @ offset 0) Fixes: 0c1228486bef ("perf lock contention: Support pre-5.14 kernels") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c index 8911e2a077d8..30c193078bdb 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c @@ -418,11 +418,11 @@ int contention_end(u64 *ctx) extern struct rq runqueues __ksym; -struct rq__old { +struct rq___old { raw_spinlock_t lock; } __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); -struct rq__new { +struct rq___new { raw_spinlock_t __lock; } __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); @@ -434,8 +434,8 @@ int BPF_PROG(collect_lock_syms) for (int i = 0; i < MAX_CPUS; i++) { struct rq *rq = bpf_per_cpu_ptr(&runqueues, i); - struct rq__new *rq_new = (void *)rq; - struct rq__old *rq_old = (void *)rq; + struct rq___new *rq_new = (void *)rq; + struct rq___old *rq_old = (void *)rq; if (rq == NULL) break; -- 2.40.1.495.gc816e09b53d-goog