Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/24] Second set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 12:48 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:42 AM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > This is a follow up for RFC [1]. It migrates a second batch of 23
> > verifier/*.c tests to inline assembly and use of ./test_progs for
> > actual execution. Link to the first batch is [2].
> > 
> > The migration is done by a python script (see [3]) with minimal manual
> > adjustments.
> 
> All makes sense to me.
> Took 22 out of 24 patches.
> The 13 and 14 had conflicts.
> Also there is a precision fix in bpf tree.
> So we're going to wait for bpf/bpf-next to converge during
> the merge window next week, then add another precision test as asm
> and then regenerate conversion of the precision tests.
> Not sure why 14 was conflicting.

Oh, understood, thank you.
The #14 does not apply because it also starts from 'p',
so the hunk below does not match:

--- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
 #include "verifier_masking.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_meta_access.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_precise.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_prevent_map_lookup.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_raw_stack.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_raw_tp_writable.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_reg_equal.skel.h"

I will resend it shortly.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux