Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] fix __retval() being always ignored

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:23:13 +0300 you wrote:
> Florian Westphal found a bug in test_loader.c processing of __retval tag.
> Because of this bug the function test_loader.c:do_prog_test_run()
> never executed and all __retval test tags were ignored. See [1].
> 
> Fix for this bug uncovers two additional bugs:
> - During test_verifier tests migration to inline assembly (see [2])
>   I missed the fact that some tests require maps to contain mock values;
> - Some issue with a new refcounted_kptr test, which causes kernel to
>   produce dead lock and refcount saturation warnings when subject to
>   libbpf's bpf_test_run_opts().
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/4] selftests/bpf: disable program test run for progs/refcounted_kptr.c
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7c4b96c00043
  - [bpf-next,2/4] selftests/bpf: fix __retval() being always ignored
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7cdddb99e4a6
  - [bpf-next,3/4] selftests/bpf: add pre bpf_prog_test_run_opts() callback for test_loader
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5b22f4d1436b
  - [bpf-next,4/4] selftests/bpf: populate map_array_ro map for verifier_array_access test
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/cbb110bc6672

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux