Re: [PATCH 28/32] sched_ext: Implement core-sched support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 11:33:29AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
...
>  
> +static int balance_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
> +		       struct rq_flags *rf)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = balance_one(rq, prev, rf, true);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * When core-sched is enabled, this ops.balance() call will be followed
> +	 * by put_prev_scx() and pick_task_scx() on this CPU and pick_task_scx()
> +	 * on the SMT siblings. Balance the siblings too.
> +	 */
> +	if (sched_core_enabled(rq)) {
> +		const struct cpumask *smt_mask = cpu_smt_mask(cpu_of(rq));

balance_scx() should be a no-op if CONFIG_SCHED_SMT is undefined or we
may get a build error here.

For example with a minimal ppc64le config (and CONFIG_SCHED_SMT off) I
can reproduce this:

 ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h:139:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_smt_mask'; did you mean 'cpu_cpu_mask'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

So maybe have something like this (or similar):

#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
...
#else
static inline int balance_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
		       struct rq_flags *rf)
{
	return 0
}
#endif

Thanks,
-Andrea



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux