Re: [PATCH] tracing: Refuse fprobe if RCU is not watching

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 9 Apr 2023 20:45:39 +0800
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I didn't notice preempt_{disable,enable}_notrace before :(
> Seems that is a better solution. I have verified that it really works.

Great.

> 
> BTW, why can we attach fentry to preempt_count_sub(), but can't attach
> it to migrate_disable() ?
> migrate_disable() isn't hidden from ftrace either...

You can't?

 # trace-cmd -p function -l migrate_disable
 # trace-cmd show
          <idle>-0       [000] ..s2. 153664.937829: migrate_disable <-bpf_prog_run_clear_cb
          <idle>-0       [000] ..s2. 153664.937834: migrate_disable <-bpf_prog_run_clear_cb
          <idle>-0       [000] ..s2. 153664.937835: migrate_disable <-bpf_prog_run_clear_cb
          <idle>-0       [000] ..s2. 153665.769555: migrate_disable <-bpf_prog_run_clear_cb
          <idle>-0       [000] ..s2. 153665.772109: migrate_disable <-bpf_prog_run_clear_cb

I think bpf prevents it. Perhaps that's another solution:

See 35e3815fa8102 ("bpf: Add deny list of btf ids check for tracing programs")

-- Steve



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux