Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 2/2] net: introduce budget_squeeze to help us tune rx behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:23 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:59:46 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> > I'm wondering for now if I can update and resend this patch to have a
> > better monitor (actually we do need one) on this part since we have
> > touched the net_rx_action() in the rps optimization patch series?
> > Also, just like Jesper mentioned before, it can be considered as one
> > 'fix' to a old problem but targetting to net-next is just fine. What
> > do you think about it ?
>
> Sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say :(

Previously this patch was not accepted because we do not want to touch
softirqs (actually which is net_rx_action()). Since it is touched in
the commit [1] in recent days, I would like to ask your permission:
could I resend this patch to the mailing list? I hope we can get it
merged.

This patch can be considered as a 'fix' to the old problem. It's
beneficial and harmless, I think :)

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=8b43fd3d1d7d

Thanks,
Jason




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux