Recent change to fprintf (see below) causes incorrect `type_fprintf()` behavior for pointers annotated with btf_type_tag, for example: $ cat tag-test.c #define __t __attribute__((btf_type_tag("t1"))) struct foo { int __t *a; } g; $ clang -g -c tag-test.c -o tag-test.o && \ pahole -J tag-test.o && pahole --sort -F dwarf tag-test.o struct foo { int a; /* 0 8 */ ... }; Note that `*` is missing in the pahole output. The issue is caused by `goto next_type` that jumps over the `tag__name()` that is responsible for pointer printing. As agreed in [1] `type__fprintf()` is modified to skip type tags for now and would be modified to emit type tags later. The change in `__tag__name()` is necessary to avoid the following behavior: $ cat tag-test.c #define __t __attribute__((btf_type_tag("t1"))) struct foo { int __t *a; int __t __t *b; } g; $ clang -g -c tag-test.c -o tag-test.o && \ pahole -J tag-test.o && pahole --sort -F dwarf tag-test.o struct foo { int * a; /* 0 8 */ int * b; /* 8 8 */ ... }; Note the extra space before `*` for field `b`. The issue was reported and tracked down to the root cause by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo. Links: [1] https://lore.kernel.org/dwarves/20230314230417.1507266-1-eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx/T/#md82b04f66867434524beec746138951f26a3977e Fixes: e7fb771f2649 ("fprintf: Correct names for types with btf_type_tag attribute") Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dwarves/20230314230417.1507266-1-eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx/T/#mc630bcd474ddd64c70d237edd4e0590dc048d63d Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> --- dwarves_fprintf.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/dwarves_fprintf.c b/dwarves_fprintf.c index 1e6147a..818db2d 100644 --- a/dwarves_fprintf.c +++ b/dwarves_fprintf.c @@ -572,7 +572,6 @@ static const char *__tag__name(const struct tag *tag, const struct cu *cu, case DW_TAG_restrict_type: case DW_TAG_atomic_type: case DW_TAG_unspecified_type: - case DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation: type = cu__type(cu, tag->type); if (type == NULL && tag->type != 0) tag__id_not_found_snprintf(bf, len, tag->type); @@ -618,6 +617,13 @@ static const char *__tag__name(const struct tag *tag, const struct cu *cu, case DW_TAG_variable: snprintf(bf, len, "%s", variable__name(tag__variable(tag))); break; + case DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation: + type = cu__type(cu, tag->type); + if (type == NULL && tag->type != 0) + tag__id_not_found_snprintf(bf, len, tag->type); + else if (!tag__has_type_loop(tag, type, bf, len, NULL)) + __tag__name(type, cu, bf, len, conf); + break; default: snprintf(bf, len, "%s%s", tag__prefix(cu, tag->tag, pconf), type__name(tag__type(tag)) ?: ""); @@ -677,6 +683,22 @@ static size_t type__fprintf_stats(struct type *type, const struct cu *cu, return printed; } +static type_id_t skip_llvm_annotations(const struct cu *cu, type_id_t id) +{ + struct tag *type; + + for (;;) { + if (id == 0) + break; + type = cu__type(cu, id); + if (type == NULL || type->tag != DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation || type->type == id) + break; + id = type->type; + } + + return id; +} + static size_t union__fprintf(struct type *type, const struct cu *cu, const struct conf_fprintf *conf, FILE *fp); @@ -778,19 +800,17 @@ inner_struct: next_type: switch (type->tag) { - case DW_TAG_pointer_type: - if (type->type != 0) { + case DW_TAG_pointer_type: { + type_id_t ptype_id = skip_llvm_annotations(cu, type->type); + + if (ptype_id != 0) { int n; - struct tag *ptype = cu__type(cu, type->type); + struct tag *ptype = cu__type(cu, ptype_id); if (ptype == NULL) goto out_type_not_found; n = tag__has_type_loop(type, ptype, NULL, 0, fp); if (n) return printed + n; - if (ptype->tag == DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation) { - type = ptype; - goto next_type; - } if (ptype->tag == DW_TAG_subroutine_type) { printed += ftype__fprintf(tag__ftype(ptype), cu, name, 0, 1, @@ -811,6 +831,7 @@ next_type: } } /* Fall Thru */ + } default: print_default: printed += fprintf(fp, "%-*s %s", tconf.type_spacing, -- 2.40.0