Re: Flaky bpf cg_storage_* tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:40 AM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi YiFei and Stan, it is observed that the cg_stroage_* tests fail from time to
> time. A recent example is
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/4543867424/jobs/8009943115?pr=3924
>
> Could you help to take a look? may be run it under netns and also have better
> filtering by ip/port when counting packets?

Error: #43/2 cg_storage_multi/isolated
test_isolated:PASS:skel-load 0 nsec
test_isolated:PASS:parent-egress1-cg-attach 0 nsec
test_isolated:PASS:parent-egress2-cg-attach 0 nsec
test_isolated:PASS:parent-ingress-cg-attach 0 nsec
test_isolated:PASS:first-connect-send 0 nsec
test_isolated:FAIL:first-invoke invocations=2

Error: #43/3 cg_storage_multi/shared
test_shared:PASS:skel-load 0 nsec
test_shared:PASS:parent-egress1-cg-attach 0 nsec
test_shared:PASS:parent-egress2-cg-attach 0 nsec
test_shared:PASS:parent-ingress-cg-attach 0 nsec
test_shared:PASS:first-connect-send 0 nsec
test_shared:FAIL:first-invoke invocations=2

Probably because we're using tcp? And race with syn vs syn+ack
(invocatoins=1 vs invocations=2)?
YiFei, maybe we should count only pure syns?

> Thanks!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux