On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:23 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > [...] > > > > > In term of logical structure and maybe extensibility, this is more appropriate, > > > in term of pragmatism maybe less. > > > > > > I don't have strong opinions and can see benefit for both. > > > > idk, I don't have a strong opinion either. > > me neither, flatter struct would be simple to work with either with jq > or hacky grepping, so I guess the question would be how much do we > lose by using flatter structure? Okay, okay, noone wants to read jq manual, I get it :) I assume that current plan is to consume this output by some CI script (and e.g. provide a foldable list of failed tests/sub-tests in the final output). So, we should probably use whatever makes more sense for those scripts. If you and Manu think that flat structure works best -- so be it.
