[PATCH bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Use ASSERT_EQ instead ASSERT_OK for testing memcmp result

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>

In tcp_hdr_options test, it ensures the received tcp hdr option
and the sk local storage have the expected values. It uses memcmp
to check that. Testing the memcmp result with ASSERT_OK is confusing
because ASSERT_OK will print out the errno which is not set.
This patch uses ASSERT_EQ to check for 0 instead.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
index 5cf85d0f9827..13bcaeb028b8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int check_hdr_opt(const struct bpf_test_option *exp,
 			 const struct bpf_test_option *act,
 			 const char *hdr_desc)
 {
-	if (!ASSERT_OK(memcmp(exp, act, sizeof(*exp)), hdr_desc)) {
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(memcmp(exp, act, sizeof(*exp)), 0, hdr_desc)) {
 		print_option(exp, "expected: ");
 		print_option(act, "  actual: ");
 		return -1;
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static int check_hdr_stg(const struct hdr_stg *exp, int fd,
 		  "map_lookup(hdr_stg_map_fd)"))
 		return -1;
 
-	if (!ASSERT_OK(memcmp(exp, &act, sizeof(*exp)), stg_desc)) {
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(memcmp(exp, &act, sizeof(*exp)), 0, stg_desc)) {
 		print_hdr_stg(exp, "expected: ");
 		print_hdr_stg(&act, "  actual: ");
 		return -1;
-- 
2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux