On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 5:58 AM Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 3/11/23 08:36, Jason Xing wrote: > > From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > When we encounter some performance issue and then get lost on how > > to tune the budget limit and time limit in net_rx_action() function, > > we can separately counting both of them to avoid the confusion. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > note: this commit is based on the link as below: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230311151756.83302-1-kerneljasonxing@xxxxxxxxx/ > > --- > > include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 + > > net/core/dev.c | 12 ++++++++---- > > net/core/net-procfs.c | 9 ++++++--- > > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h > > index 6a14b7b11766..5736311a2133 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h > > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h > > @@ -3157,6 +3157,7 @@ struct softnet_data { > > /* stats */ > > unsigned int processed; > > unsigned int time_squeeze; > > + unsigned int budget_squeeze; > > #ifdef CONFIG_RPS > > struct softnet_data *rps_ipi_list; > > #endif > > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c > > index 253584777101..bed7a68fdb5d 100644 > > --- a/net/core/dev.c > > +++ b/net/core/dev.c > > @@ -6637,6 +6637,7 @@ static __latent_entropy void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h) > > unsigned long time_limit = jiffies + > > usecs_to_jiffies(READ_ONCE(netdev_budget_usecs)); > > int budget = READ_ONCE(netdev_budget); > > + bool is_continue = true; > > LIST_HEAD(list); > > LIST_HEAD(repoll); > > > > @@ -6644,7 +6645,7 @@ static __latent_entropy void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h) > > list_splice_init(&sd->poll_list, &list); > > local_irq_enable(); > > > > - for (;;) { > > + for (; is_continue;) { > > struct napi_struct *n; > > > > skb_defer_free_flush(sd); > > @@ -6662,10 +6663,13 @@ static __latent_entropy void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h) > > * Allow this to run for 2 jiffies since which will allow > > * an average latency of 1.5/HZ. > > */ > > - if (unlikely(budget <= 0 || > > - time_after_eq(jiffies, time_limit))) { > > + if (unlikely(budget <= 0)) { > > + sd->budget_squeeze++; > > + is_continue = false; > > + } > > + if (unlikely(time_after_eq(jiffies, time_limit))) { > > sd->time_squeeze++; > > - break; > > + is_continue = false; > > } > > } > > > > diff --git a/net/core/net-procfs.c b/net/core/net-procfs.c > > index 97a304e1957a..4d1a499d7c43 100644 > > --- a/net/core/net-procfs.c > > +++ b/net/core/net-procfs.c > > @@ -174,14 +174,17 @@ static int softnet_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > > */ > > seq_printf(seq, > > "%08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x " > > - "%08x %08x\n", > > - sd->processed, sd->dropped, sd->time_squeeze, 0, > > + "%08x %08x %08x %08x\n", > > + sd->processed, sd->dropped, > > + 0, /* was old way to count time squeeze */ > > Should we show a proximate number? For example, > sd->time_squeeze + sd->bud_squeeze. Yeah, It does make sense. Let the old way to display untouched. > > > > + 0, > > 0, 0, 0, 0, /* was fastroute */ > > 0, /* was cpu_collision */ > > sd->received_rps, flow_limit_count, > > 0, /* was len of two backlog queues */ > > (int)seq->index, > > - softnet_input_pkt_queue_len(sd), softnet_process_queue_len(sd)); > > + softnet_input_pkt_queue_len(sd), softnet_process_queue_len(sd), > > + sd->time_squeeze, sd->budget_squeeze); > > return 0; > > } > >
